When dealing with bacterial toxins, there are three varieties of microbes that develop in your petri dish: toxic, resistant, and susceptible. Initially, there are only toxic and vulnerable bacteria. Over time some bacteria become resistant and outbreed the toxic microbes because it is an energy load to produce toxins. Once the toxin producers disappear, the excess load to be resistant is a disadvantage and normal microbes prevail. For anti-malarials especially in Southeast Asia, this does not happen. Normal strains of malaria do not reemerge with the absence of these drugs. Are antimalarials working differently than toxins are other forces propping up resistant strains? All ideas are welcome

More Christopher Gerard Yukna's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions