We have used a central Visual Field (VF) approach for studying glaucoma and other VF defects, and we didn't use flickering light sources, but, rather, growing intensity lights. Besides, we used some (central) flickering light to study deep dives effects on visual acuity. We didn't use (in clinical experiments) flickering lights in perimetry. But, why do it? It's a very time consuming test!

Ichhpujani P, Lo DC, Cvintal V, et al. Flicker defined form, standard perimetry and Heidelberg retinal tomography: Structure-function relationships. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(4):290-296. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.05.010

The FDF stimulus has been found to detect beginning glaucoma damage. But Patients with SAP-MD values exceeding 5 dB should be monitored with conventional perimetry because of its larger dynamic range. I don't think FDF Perimetry would be of much help in screening.