Dear Popov

Here I send You many reference that I got with coogle...I hope, This will be a bit begining

Best Regards

OttoRendon

http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/1/28

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140530092640.htm

Dear Otto,

Thank you!

Best wishes,

Igor

JR. Burger, "Circuit Elements and Connections Inspired by Neurons" IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, vol. 15, no. 1, 2015, pp. 48-55,  and also their References

My department has lots of 2D kinematic measures of the Lumbar spine, Check out our website, at the bottom of which are some videos of our kinematic measurements of the spine.

http://www.aecc.ac.uk/research-at-aecc/imrci/osmia/ 

We have population data sets for both persons with chronic low back pain and control population

Scoliosis can be quite tough for us though due to the axial rotation it the scoliosis is to great.

A.

Dear Horia, 

Dear Alexander,

Thank you!

Igor

Does this help you?

SourceAvailable from: Vincent J Leferink

Article: Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. (so to say new: 2004)

R B Post, V J M Leferink

[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]

ABSTRACT: In this paper the SpinalMouse, a new computerised external device for measuring sagittal spinal range of motion (ROM), was tested for inter-rater reliability and use in clinical practice. To assess inter-rater reliability, two investigators each measured 111 subjects. Correlation coefficients were found to be r=0.90 for flexion, r=0.85 for extension and r=0.90 for total inclination. Intra-class coefficients were 0.95 for flexion, 0.92 for extension and 0.95 for total inclination. A poor agreement (kappa=0.22) was found for the presence of outliers from normal values for intersegmental ROM. We conclude the device is a useful, reliable tool for measuring sagittal spinal ROM in clinical practice, considering the small load it confers on patients and the short amount of time the measurement involves. The SpinalMouse might be more accurate after following the recommendations we make.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 05/2004; 124(3):187-92. DOI:10.1007/s00402-004-0641-1 · 1.31 Impact Factor

Dear Vincent,

Thank you!

Igor