Heavy metals are everywhere, in one form or the other. All salts of a heavy metal are either not soluble or not harmful. The present trend in heavy metals research has revealed that every part of the planet Earth is full of hazard. Do you think we have to change the methods and techniques and find out the actual hazard?

All heavy metals are not bad (eg iron is even an essential one for life but can be lethal if over-consumed), and some are only hazardous when in certain forms or solutions (trivalent chromium is sometimes considered to be an essential nutrient whereas hexavalent chromium is carcinogenic. Trivalent chr can be oxidised into hexavalent, which can be buffered back into trivalent). Similarly lead (Pb) mostly found in sulfate form, which is insoluble in water and not available for plant to be taken. The heavy metals in question are those contributing to direct bodily and ecosystem harm and needed to be focused.

More Nafees Mohammad's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions