Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the world has turned to e-learning, and it has been imposed as a reality. Do you think that e-learning is capable of giving the same results as traditional education?
Face-to-face learning/education and e-learning should not compete but complement each other.
Hi Dr.
Article Impact of e-learning vs traditional learning on students' pe...
the result depend on the instructional methods as the characteristics of the audience.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://potomac.edu/learning/online-learning-vs-traditional-learning/&ved=2ahUKEwiY76-bvqvqAhWKzaQKHal_DwgQFjAIegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw2g58aAUSuHoOVxjhDWpHPO
Hi Dr
No
Equierd more suitable conditions as well as a period of time.
This is not possible, especially for scientific and medical specialties.
No, the reason is that performing tests from home leads to
Cheat.
The total dependence of the student on the Internet.
https://www.ijmrhs.com/medical-research/impact-of-elearning-vs-traditional-learning-on-students-performance-and-attitude.pdf
Of course not and the reasons are many:
1- Not controlling fraud cases
2- The lack of support from the Ministry
3- Weak internet service
4- The weak financial condition of most students
E-learning is not able to give the same results as traditional education. Rather, it is an auxiliary education for traditional education even if its requirements are met.
No, e-learning can not be compensated traditional learning, we faced a lot of obstacles with this learning, especially at the countries that applied it recently.
https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ijmrhs.com%2Fmedical-research%2Fimpact-of-elearning-vs-traditional-learning-on-students-performance-and-attitude.pdf
Surely no.....
It gives a way for telecommunications and supervision, but it can't replace the field training, nor skill achievements.
Hi
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338528127_Impact_of_e-learning_vs_traditional_learning_on_students'_performance_and_attitude
I do not think so. When technology replaces teachers in the teaching/learning process, this process loses the humane dimension of such a process. Technology ignores the language of commitment, compassion, sympathy., empathy, a language that only teacher speak. To sum up, e-teaching helps teachers but not replace them.
E-learning has been playing a pivotal role in this pandemic,but it can not replace the traditional teaching efficiency.
Dear Terry Purvis,
Thanks for you agreement with my post. It seems that we all agree with the idea that e-learning is not equivalent to traditional education in terms of results. In the teaching/learning process nothing is as good as the presence of both students and teachers at schools.
I think that e-learning is better than traditional education in students ’grades, but in terms of achieving learning outcomes, traditional education is better.
This article is very useful to explain the Impact of E-Learning vs Traditional Learning on Student’s Performance and Attitude:
https://www.ijmrhs.com/medical-research/impact-of-elearning-vs-traditional-learning-on-students-performance-and-attitude.pdf
This article too is very good:
Article Impact of e-learning vs traditional learning on students' pe...
I think it depends on the level of the learners. I found it best suits and shows lots of positive effects on learning achievement as well as learning habits for adult learners who has willingness towards learning and creating knowledge by ownself through little guidance. But in case of school level students and who has lower interest in learning shows negative effects in learning achievement and physical growth. So e-learnings effects has affected by the level and type of the learners.
Attempts to use e-education to obtain the same results as ordinary education do not lead to anything good. There should be other goals and results in e-education
No, but not for the same reasons stated. We have taught our learners how to use e-learning efficiently and effectively. Providing a full time curricula for them to engage with, and for the most part our end of year assessments are on par with previous years. Areas which were obviously lower were those that rely on practical skills. So in response to the question, "Do you think that e-learning is equivalent to traditional education in terms of results?" my response is it can be, in the right circumstances with students and teachers appropriately supported and trained in how to receive and deliver engaging online materials.
This time E- learning is not capable of giving the same results as traditional education because change takes time to be part of human nature. As time goes on it will be capable of giving the same results as the traditional education gives. This will be as a result of making the e-learning to be our traditional way of teaching. The world has turned to this approach and what is remaining to us is just adopting and adaptation to the new trend.
It can equivalent traditional education and be better when the questions asked to students are ideational and deductive.
It is important that research be done to determine if distance education is as effective as traditional education. The determine if distance education is better, worse, or as good as traditional education.
In light of the current conditions that our country and the world are going through and for the sake of communication between the student and his teacher, I see that e-learning fulfills some requirements and bridges the void, but it is not a substitute for class education face to face.
Recently, with the proliferation of internet technology, the E-learning has become an essential method and new epitome that is widely used and implemented by educational institutions across the globe. But the traditional teaching is the best on achieving learning outcomes.
As far as I know, there are not sufficient research results about the question. And, probably, the efficiency of e-learning depends on such a number of variables as traditional classroom learning does. By now, we can suppose that both are intercomplementary. And during the pandemic period, if possible, any educational system must try some compensation with e-learning.
In Iraqi school there are many dificlities in terms of apply e_learning many teachers and students theg dont have any expetience to use e_leRnind in addition the students prefer traditional Methods
Rahem Alziadi I don't think so. E-learning gives good results when it is used as a support for face to face teaching. So, I think that the best teaching method is the blended learning.
The recent use of remote E-learning has magnified its shortcomings. It is a ready and useful supplemental tool but, many who are trying to use it are not versed in the "smart classroom" and other methods of delivery they are focused on getting the technology to work and not the nuances of traditional means. It depends on what you are trying to accomplish....
Dear. Dr. Yacine Lafifi
This depends on the nature of the study materials, the type of study, the scientific subjects cannot be taught by default. These materials need to be face-to-face between the teacher and students
This time we have no option and we needed e-lerning system and must work hard on creating electronic content, then we can compare the results with traditional education in the same region.
E-learning is not able to give the same results as traditional education. Rather, it is an auxiliary education for traditional education even if its requirements are met.
Hello,
This article talk about Online Learning is Just as Effective as Traditional Education, According to a New MIT Study:
https://www.americaninno.com/boston/mit-study-how-do-online-courses-compare-to-traditional-learning/
Online learning is known as the education that takes place over the Internet. Often referred to as “eLearning”, or “distance learning” – online learning involves the umbrella term for any learning that takes place across distance and not in a traditional classroom.
Online and traditional learning institutions both have their advantages and disadvantages. However, one thing is for sure: online education is here to stay, and its demand is on the rise.
It's too soon to Search for results, but we have to consider that traditional teachers were not prepared for distance learning, that is why prompt results have to be double checked.
I think it largely depends on the individual. E-learning requires a lot of self discipline and motivation which might affect the result in the long run
Not in its present form but traditional learning practices have developed over several decades, and e-learning also needs to evolve.
I don't think so, I prefer to face to face class, E-learning is not as efficient as traditional class due to lack of direct interaction, even right now it is convenient for the transition time
I think that depends on what are we studying, at this moment, study fields were on their confort zone since some years before (unless on my country) so this pandemic time, give us a chances to improve the quality of the contents and opened the eyes for new tools.
Xiaolei Ye
I believe that e-learning lacks the spirit of education achieved by traditional education
Fernando Vega
As a teacher, I find e-learning is lacking in enthusiasm and a sense of interaction compared to traditional educationز
Me too, this is a chance to create a new enthusiasm looking forward to the next step in the learning process.
New answers for new moments.
E-learning is a new experience. In short term, it may not compete with in-class teaching but the immediate access to a great body of knowledge in terms of videos, and snaps, formulae etc. available on the net can easily beat in-class teaching. The unlimited size of the class room and time and resources saved in going to class-room are obvious advantages.
Short Answer is NO
Detailed Answer: As a teacher and student myself, I miss the face to face interactions with my students, colleagues, and teacher. The supporters of e-learning are quick to point out the advantages of online learning ( which I do not deny) However, talking to a person's face to face can never replace talking to people sitting in front of their screens and visible only as small boxes.
Surely face to face teaching is remarkable and you can read student's faces telling you how much have they understood but most of the students are shy of asking questions face to face where as they talk freely on E-class, lecture recorded during E-class can be listened to as many times as you like, even teachers can correct themselves by listening to their own recording and improve for the next lecture. Teachers get more time to collect lecture resources in terms of hardware and software. Surely there can be several improvements in on-line teaching.
E-learning is a new method and have a lot of good points. Both teacher sido and student side get concentrated. The results and homework are easy to get. The combination of real and e-leraning education will be done in tourism industry,
I suspect that face to face learning (in-class) will actually be mask to mask, perhaps with face shields and/or behind plastic barriers. Maybe there will be a new appreciation of online in being able to "see" one another's expressions. I found quite thoughtful interactions over the spring term and look forward to developing non-traditional forms of co-learning with my students.
Traditional face to face education can be equivalent to online education with regard to results. Notwithstanding, it must be taken into account that the results of educational processes depend on many factors, among them: the available resources to educators and students, the training and experience of instructors, the technological literacy they have, their dedication in preparing their courses, the institutional support they receive, their pedagogical methods and teaching strategies, and the commitment of the students. Changing from face to face education to online education requires adaptation―rethinking our methods and redesigning our strategies.
its a necessity and i dont agree to be equivalent to the traditional or classical learning
We don't have technologies capable to replacing the human variable in any process of educational formation. Nor would holography be efficient in teaching processes considering the fact that physical interactions between subjects are a fundamental part of the learning process. The newest technologies are only complementary supports to learning-teaching, but can not be seen under the centrality of pedagogical process. We should also consider that the great social unequality for acessing resources and manipulate them. And all these depends of age range, educational level and democracy of access. Therefore, in terms of results, these variables may even generate injustices and impediments for the majority of oppressed and excluded social classes.
One of the sectors most affected during the viral emergency of COVID-19 is education, which had a change towards virtuality. To contribute to the debate, especially in pandemic medical education, I wish to share the following manuscript.
Article Educación médica en tiempo de Pandemia: el caso de la Enferm...
It is a complex question in a complex situation. Maybe it would be necessary to consider some aspects. For example, to compare which modality could be better, in what situation, in which teachers were trained to teach online or in this one that are in transition and that were not trained for these experiences? Is it fair to attribute some difficulties to the sport? Or teacher training? Are managers providing this for all students, and for those who are not following the activities because they lack connectivity? Do schools provide adequate infrastructure and equipment for teachers to teach online? What are the expected results in face-to-face, content transmission? Developing student skills and competences? Massive teaching that in the classroom most of the time only the teacher speaks and presents content and has few possibilities for interaction or expression by students? or individualized care? For which age group? What educational level? What curriculum subject? I think that in two cases there are advantages and disadvantages and depending on what the expected results, the best of each modality could be used. Or instead of dividing why not add up?
For present situation e-learning tremendously helped in contribution of knowledge and teaching-learning. It is more convenient platform. But there are many instances where direct learning is better and e-learning can't replace direct learning in such cases.