In a deterministic world, everything must have a cause. If a person is happy, then they are happy for some reason, even if he are not aware of the reasons for their happiness. There is a good Russian proverb that states that objective happiness without a reason is a sign of foolishness
thanks for the question. In this sense, I would like to take the opportunity to provide a validated questionnaire that corresponds to part of a personal investigation. The questionnaire can be self-translated with the browser. It is completely anonymous and is answered in less than 5 minutes:
No, happiness is not a measure of meaning at all. Instead, happiness is a fleeting feeling that comes and goes as quickly as the sun rises and falls. Happiness is an avoidance behaviour, an illusion that life can be better than we anticipate. It is the illusion of a life without challenges- nothing more.
Yes, I agree that true happiness involves feeling a deep sense of pleasure in life and enjoying it without any specific reason. Genuine happiness transcends external circumstances or achievements, as it stems from an inner state of contentment and appreciation for the present moment. It is about finding joy in the simple pleasures of existence, embracing the beauty around us, and experiencing a profound connection with life itself. True happiness is not contingent upon external factors but rather emerges from within, driven by a genuine sense of gratitude and the ability to derive pleasure from the richness of everyday experiences.
There's a circularity in your question which makes it unhelpful. Define true happiness in the first instance. Who does the defining? You, as the external observer pronouncing on the other person's experience? Or the other person as s/he construes their own experience? Moreover, the observer's pronouncement may disagree with the other person's experience; and there is no immediate way of resolving the disagreement. I suppose one has to wait and see how effectively the other person handles their existence, based on the way in which that other person construes it. Have a look at Kelly, G.A. A Theory of Personality: the Psychology of Personal Constructs. London: Norton 1963, or any of his other writings.