Einstein tired to construct EM force as an aspect of geometry.
while i am constructing a theory of quantum gravity i tried so many ways. EM force as an aspect of geometry is one of them.
i am requesting to unique scholars to discuss about this.
Working Paper E M force as geometry1
Gravity and electric charge have something in common. The gravitational field around a mass has a potential such that all points at the same distance to the centre of mass have the same potential. The same is true with an electric field. Both cases have an equipotential sphere in the simples form. In general Relativity this sphere is described as a flat surface in curved spacetime. Then also is computed that this spacetime can expand and wobble. Assuming that the fabric of space stretches and moves while dragging mass with it at superluminal speed is the result of the Hubble Expansion view.
You might be able to do something similar with EM. Mathematics is patient. You ask at what condition can a curved spherical surface be seen as flat in a small domain and you will get the answer that this will be the case if you assume space to be curved in that domain. That question doesn't answer if space is curved. It only states under what mathematical conditions a donkey can bee seen as a horse(When you make the definition that single hoof animals are of the same animal kind).
Regards,
Paul Gradenwitz
@Paul Gradenwitz
My dear Paul Gradenwitz, thank you for your participation.
In a document, I clearly mentioned at what condition we can take EM force as a curvature of space time.
EM as geometry was described by Kalusa-Klein theory:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluza%E2%80%93Klein_theory
That was essentially a precursor of Brans-Dicke theory which incorporates gravity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brans%E2%80%93Dicke_theory
@George Dishman
My dear George Dishman, thank you..
Kalusa-Klein theory take extra dimensions to prove this and the idea of Kalusa-Klein rejected by Einstein.
In this work I am not taking any extra dimensions.
Dear Hussainsha,
Yes. EM force is a space time geometry. My recent paper describes the diameter for all quantum of all forces in terms of space time curvature.For EM force the space time diameter is calculated as 6.783124×10^-20. mts. by this we can decide the curvature associated to EM force and it can be compared to gravitational force. Pls. refer the paper for details(In its present form it is very difficult to digest that the existence of space for a particle which moves with 'velocity of light'(But There is a meaning in it. my forth coming papers will explain it)
Link: Values of Siva’s Constant “K” for All Fundamental Forces—A Review on Spin, Threshold Time and Quantum Entanglement.(anybody can view it in my RG profile)
https://file.scirp.org/pdf/JMP_2019032115392293.pdf
@Siva Prasad Kodukula
My dear Siva Prasad Kodukula, thank you ..I go through link you provided.
Dear shs hussainsha, thanks for your invitation.
My viewpoint on your question is:
Electromagnetic force doesn't exist. Gravitational force and electrostatic force exist and they don't have geometrical nature but physical nature.
@Daniele Sasso,
My dear Daniele Sasso thank you for your participation. I welcome your idea..
Dear s h s hussainsha,
You are not intending to take extra dimensions. Now consider what is the effect. Space is described to have curvature under the influence of matter. Then we add EM and get a different curvature. For a charged particle the EM fields are of relevance. For charge less particles these fields have no relevance. Curvature is something intrinsic to the space you describe. Having two curve radii for one location in spacetime makes it for me even more convincing that these curved spacetime constructs are good for calculation but have little in common with reality.
Regards,
Paul Gradenwitz
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Physiology
- Physiological Processes
- Stress