It is much beyond one has to think about the problem. There is no solid proof (though people believe) that the climate is changing due to human beings; though, we can't null-hypothesize ignorantly. It is still to think about our capabilities, such as tools, observations to understand better about the science.

Yes you are right but human is the cause of pollution and responsible to change all landscape of the world with vast rapid development as well as increase there numbers.

Landscape is being changed is right as is evident by clear observations, and so is the air pollution, which is quite temporary, unlike climate change. However, I don't see such solid evidence for the climate change; though, we simply assume without any proof. Of course, the data shows, but I do have clear doubt on the data itself because of inherent problems while retrieving/producing such data from observations/modeling tools.

In a nutshell, the clear observations mentioned above should drive us to make climate change issue clear with much deeper understanding on the physical processes than we have known.

Yes, climate change is not a baby which we see after birth this is a child. Climate change has thousands of causes seems as cumulative after several cycle. I am talking from origin of life to date and also linking this issue with spiritual. Simply we know global temp and sea level is rising,  seasonal variation and changes in crop cycle, treeline shift, glaciation, snow melt all we read in research papers of IPCC panel. There is  Countrywide competition for CC issues and most of countries have cultivated dollars from different donors. So my issue is not linking this cover of CC, EBA, CBA. I am talking about the spiritual societies and unwanted growth of human beings which were living with fresh air with long life expectancy in 100 years back now suffering the crowd, pollution, unethical, non spiritual society. We can relief to avoiding this issues and adapting spiritual society. What do you think?

I am completely rational; there is no scope of spirituality in me. Spirituality is mostly belief based system, and these believes are baseless, only personal and hard feelings. That is the reason why they are called Believes.

My experience studying climate for the past six years did not include any spirituality, and I am sure I won't include in the future either. My comments are based on discussing with the experienced researchers, the critical analysis of the climate research literature, observational techniques, and modeling tools. 

Ok you dont found the CC have no link about spiritual world. Why we donot link this issue with cultural and religious environment. Can we try to find out the issue even is related to the culture and region? Can we able to link cultural issue to the CC?

Do you just want to relate CC to something or you want to know the real facts? I think you are a social researcher, but it is related to science! I am not sure there is even minuscule effect of religion on CC (but not sure if it affects the real causes mentioned), and I am not sure what your meaning of culture is. However, the scientific claiming of the CC is that the urbanization, modernization, deforestation, industrialization, etc, are the causes of CC. Thinking of other unrelated causes than the valid causes are not that useful.

Good, you now coming nearer to me. How many human life's hurried in day in the Eat the surface? The second cultural related to the use of govargas as a girl, use of pinus tree for light, use of firwood. Don't mean climate change is exist only in urban areas. Trafional practice is a culture, religious part is also culture. So social science is also related to c.c. .is not science. C.c. is impact occurrd from biophysical sociocultural environment. What you think?

For your kind information, I said those are scientific claims, not mine. As far as I concern we need more research before telling that those are causing climate change; though, they are potential.

As a scientific researcher, I don't agree with consensus (Consensus is just acceptance by people without proof), even it is given by the IPCC (IPCC just compiles the research literature, but unfortunately, it does give less emphasis on digging into the observational capabilities, over-parameterization of physical processes and other issues in the modeling tools that produce the research literature compiled at).

Your discussion is just showing the causes of climate change, but do you know the effects of those causes on the climate change? That is the real piece missing in the climate studies. Once again, they are potential to cause climate change, but we need more time to confirm their real effects on the climate.

You may not want to study/know the effects of those causes on the climate change, but I know those causes climate change, but "how and why" have not been clear so far (at least for me), so I have been doing research to try to contribute something to understand those effects.

Excellent, Every research needs such idea. Because any new things comes againest to human the subject looks like funny and non realistic. After some research paper published or it covers with media than the issue definitely highlighted. Definitely i dont have any research regarding my topic so i am asking the research community to raise the issue. Even i learn theory of CC and projected CC from secondary data where modelling known as realistic tool for climate change. That's it. SO i learn all about it. If you traveled rishikesh  Haridawar area and Pasupathinath area in Nepal  than think about that local environment and think is there is something related to climate change.