Suppose a matter A with mass, m1, and spin up. Suppose a second matter B with mass,m2 and spin down. If both particles have the same mass, m1=m2. Is this a particle-antiparticle reaction? That is:
for m1=m2=m, the reaction A Sup + B Sdown --> 0
or
A Sup + B Sdown --> (A+B) with S = 0
The sum of the spins would indeed be zero, but other conserved quantities (e.g., energy-momentum) would not be. For instance, if your two particles are an electron and a positron with opposing spins, they'd indeed annihilate each other, but in the process, they'd be producing a pair of photons with opposite polarization. So the total spin would be 0 both before and after, and the total energy and momentum remain conserved.
Good Toth, I am with you but ¿Did you read the papers that I have attached with this question? Please comment about this idea written by Kimmo Rouvari.
The moment I got to the part where the "Big Bang created very tiny spiked sphere like objects", I stopped reading. Pointless nonsense, sorry.
So, if you disagree could you answer my question http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/117342/whats-the-outcome-of-two-polarized-electrons-beam-collide-head-on
@Toth That was kind of low brow answer. You should definitely read it all, it's the game changer.
Kimmo: I actually read a lot more, because I have the nasty habit of jumping ahead and scan the equations in a paper to see where the author is heading. I am sorry but I stand by my opinion. Game changer it is not; it looks more like a very amateurish flight of fancy, full of misconceptions, straw man reasoning and the like. I regret that you found my honest opinion "low brow"; in my view, what qualifies as low brow are personal attacks (I've seen a few on RG) or, well, rewarding someone's candor with a downvote is kind of low brow, too.
@Toth I agree that downvoting was low brow too, sry about that.
Anyway, suggested experiment proves me right. Unfortunately (and luckily!) no such experiment has been conducted. If I'm right, we are simply doomed, so I'm actually hoping that I'm wrong. I just want to know!
Kimmo, I try to communicate with you on a personal chat, but I can't. Thank you for made the approach, but I do not want be as others that gave you some excuses like; I have no time to participate on you research, I am busy with my PhD thesis. I am very honest and clear with you, the idea does not convince me. Fist: the spin is not well defined: Even in the non relativistic quantum theory, the nature of spin remains unclear. The spin results solely from Dirac’s equation. Although the Pauli and Dirac matrices undoubtedly show the spin existence, there is some mystery as to the physical origins of and H. Torres-Silva: Spin and relativity: a semiclassical model for electron spin Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, vol. 16 número especial, 2008 73 in the visualization of the spin . One may says that spin is an intrinsic property of the matter. It must have to do with relativity even though this connection is not entirely understood. [1] Second, The spin up and down cancel because one of them is antimatter!!!! What is that? The antimatter is about two particles or matters with same mass and properties, but opposite charges.That means that; If pair of particle-antiparticle there spines could cancel one to the other? third; remember that the spin could be on different energy levels (s,p,d,....) others levels are sp, sigma,sigma*,pi, pi*, pi-sigma,... and other molecular bonding where the energy gab are between the regular levels. I can write and write more arguments about why you have to develop your idea more carefully. Good Luck and never go back, belive on your Ideas. May be you could be the next Novel geneos or the Physics of this century!!!
[1] H. Torres-Silva1, SPIN AND RELATIVITY: A SEMICLASSICAL MODEL FOR ELECTRON SPIN, Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, vol. 16 número especial, 2008
This question is because I want see the reaction of pair, may be they know something that I have overlooked.
P.D. I will be here to help or clarify some theoretical concept, if you need me. Good Luck on your journey.
@Luis I just have started the journey, therefore ToEbi contains only basic structure (so to speak). Atomic model (by ToEbi) as well as relativity part are in their very early stage.
I just hope somebody does the god damn experiment, because I can't cover all the physics by myself. Positive result would attract skillful physicists to study ToEbi. I'll most likely need your advice and help in future, so let's keep in touch!
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Statistics
- Survey