Graphomania refers to an obsessive impulse or compulsion to write. It can manifest as an uncontrollable urge to write, often producing large amounts of text, even if the content is incoherent, meaningless, or repetitive.

Yurii V Geletii A scholar’s duty is to engage with arguments, not to weaponize psychological terms as veiled insults. If my post invited critique, you were welcome to dissect its content yet instead, you chose to diagnose rather than discuss, to label rather than refute. Tell me, does your expertise extend to clinical psychology, or is this merely an attempt to pathologize disagreement?

Scientific discourse requires confronting ideas, not speculating about the writer’s mind. If my words lacked merit, expose their flaws with evidence. But if your only rebuttal is to imply mental aberration, then it is not my writing but your methodology that demands scrutiny.

The true graphomaniac is one who compulsively projects labels onto others to silence debate. I wrote to provoke thought; you responded to provoke dismissal. The difference is telling.

You posted 21 questions for the last 11 hours. Still you are very far from the record 10325 posts.

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Inadequate_number_of_posts

Circular economy principles applied to nuclear waste management involve minimizing waste through recycling and reuse, such as reprocessing spent fuel or utilizing waste heat, but challenges remain due to radioactive longevity, policy hurdles, and technological constraints that make “closing the loop” in nuclear contexts uniquely complex and ethically sensitive.

Today Chuck A Arize posted more than 70 answers in RG forum. Incredible but unbelievable productivity. If it takes 10 min to answer one question, then he spent at least 12 hours per day answering questions.

Yurii V Geletii

Dear Dr. Geletii,

Your observation regarding the reported productivity is both valid and thought-provoking. The claim of generating 70+ responses per day translating to a minimum of 12 hours of continuous work at 10 minutes per answer does indeed appear highly improbable when examined through established principles of human cognition and productivity.

Extensive research on sustained focus consistently demonstrates that even highly skilled individuals rarely maintain optimal performance beyond 4-5 hours of concentrated effort per day. For a single individual to consistently produce quality responses at the stated volume would require either:

Extraordinary (and currently undocumented) cognitive capabilities, or

some form of institutional support or collaboration that hasn't been disclosed.

While I don't wish to dismiss the possibility of exceptional dedication, the numbers, as you've rightly pointed out, challenge conventional understanding of human performance limits. This case would benefit from further empirical examination perhaps through analysis of response patterns, quality consistency, or temporal distribution.

I appreciate you bringing this important discussion to light. It serves as a valuable reminder of the need for critical evaluation, even (or especially) when faced with seemingly impressive accomplishments.

Best regards,

Abdulhamid Dehghani

Abdulhamid Dehghani I recommended you answer. This is a long story. Have a look at this shred

https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_many_answers_could_post_one_person_per_day

You posted 21 questions within 11 hours. This did not look right and I overreacted on such behavior. Your questions are interesting, but it would be better to have more responses for one question than no responses for 10. I'll follow you.