Dear and Respected Reseach gate forum,
I am Niruban Chakkaravrthy as a budding researcher in the agricultural and sustainable environment field. I will expect the global forum to answer my question and please provide why, what is your opinion?
At present, chemical approaches will be the key to food and nutritional security point of view. In terms of maintaining the health at top most priority organic approaches will be the key. Following the present condition. Chemical approaches along with use of organic practices in integrated manner can be used.
it is the integrated approach the suit the 21st century, to sustain the production and to maintain the soil health.
Sunil Kumar That's great Sir but from the adoption point of view, farmers are effectively following the integrated approach or not. That is the my question to you, Sir.
The integrated approach is the need of hour for sustainable development. But it is more easy to say than to implement. Farmers are very much used to chemicals that they are reluctant to adopt an integrated approach, be it in every recommended Integrated practices. A grass root level awareness and result oriented activities can be done to make 21st century a more proactive one.
Respected sir,
I know the present scenario of the agriculture is like a foggy atmosphere. People know that there are risks and vulnerability with the present methods and techniques but still they are going forward without knowing and awareness of the shocks and disasters ahead. The chemical farming is like a addiction people know it's harmful but not willing to leave. And the system which is running by the big powers they are getting the benefit from the trade of human health and life through this highly effective but stealth weapon. The concept seeding during the 1960s was so intensive that people think a more application of chamicals will increase the productivity. But it is no such a easy or simple things to increase the productivity. But by applying a huge chamicals we can ensure a drastic reduction in the yield and productivity. Then the question comes what will be the alternative? Is it the organic movement? Actually now in the present scenario the answer is no. The soil conditions of the country now is too much I'll that it cannot achieve the proposed production to feed the entire population. But a slow approach through having a risk storage of grains. The movement toward the organic should be well planed. The reduction of production of first 3years can be calculated and according to that the risk storage can be done. And a slow transformation of 10% land each year can be converted. And the lands which captivating for atleast 3 years in organic approach can rejuvenate and bring a projected and desirable production which can quanch the need of the entire population. And if any one have any doubts about the ability of the organic approach to produce I will like it tell it can produce enough and more than the chamical farming which will be safe, sustainable, healthy and functional. For your reference you can go through the papers mentioned below -
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338701224_EFFECT_OF_ENRICHED_SANJEEVANI_AND_AGNIHOTRA_ON_GROWTH_YIELD_AND_QUALITY_OF_BRINJAL_Solanum_melongena_L?_sg=oKEPBnIPk4vRi__Pc3rdE2OjcgVKp2U-pDNYXrO_QR7g6sSN61qIV9eZycWD4WvBb_kTbeX1bJAIvRlLJTu6sIwoVOFcZGPVg4mbuqSz.jwWGryoaQvh5PjCvAu9pox3vq5agpM5XfeNJMc0pY0ia7ouU24nFFYDKRBlCnkak2olYf5HEH2TrVotEMny1AA
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334748754_An_Experiment_on_Kitchen_Garden_through_Organic_Farming_Approach
Well said statement Saswatik Tripathy and thanks for sharing information here.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Psychology
- Attitude