This question focus on the quality of a theory. The larger the number of degrees of freedom, the lowest the value of its predictions.
A Wise Man once said, Give me enough parameters and I will fit Mickey Mouse.
I am paraphrasing it but you get the gist.
Attached is a plot of all SN1A explosions and their redshifts and distances, calculated using:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_modulus
The red dots corresponds to the Hypergeometrical Universe theory predictions (run backwards to fit the 'observed' data).
The equation used is attached. You can see that it has not parameters.
If you believe you can do better, just give it up..:) It can not be done...:)
Since it fits the data, it will come as no surprise that it will also explain without any problem both Inflationary Period and Slow Expansion Period.
The calculations are presented here:
https://issuu.com/marcopereira11/docs/huarticle
and in the Github repository:
https://github.com/ny2292000/TheHypergeometricalUniverse
The ingredients to get this d(z) are:
that is all, folks!!!
####################################################################################################################################################################################################################################
Light Absolute proportional to [G]^{-3}
I recreated this part of the argument based upon David Arnett's work,
See pages 11-13 for the arguments
The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory
####################################################################################################################################################################################################################################
The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory has been censored since 2004.
Please upvote this and all posting about it such that we may one day
Travel to the Stars..:)
https://hypergeometricaluniverse.quora.com/Selected-Postings
Theory Article:
The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory
and here
http://www.worldscientificnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/WSN-82-2017-1-96-1.pdf
######################################################
Data Trove
Universe Trove by Marco Pereira on Hypergeometrical Universe
######################################################
Postings:
NASA - Houston, we have a problem!! :)
Conversation with Matthias Jaeger by Marco Pereira on HUPeerReview
Ghostly Rings of DARK MATTER, SCHMATTER…:) by Marco Pereira on Hypergeometrical Universe
Conversations with Mole People from CERN
My Discussion with CERN - The Mole People in the Large Hadron Collider...:) by Marco Pereira on Hypergeometrical Universe
Bad Astronomer
The Bad Astronomer by Marco Pereira on Hypergeometrical Universe
######################################################
In the Scale Expanding Cosmos the only parameter needed to measure distance using the redshift is the Hubble time T. The distance is: d=T*c*ln(1+z).
That is very nice. You can see that that is also what George Dishman provided me.
I plotted it to check your calculation. It fails miserably...:)
I called it half-baked in the context of my conversation with George Dishman because I didn't see a reason for it and this is not a numerology discussion.
Let me know if you disagree.
Dear Marco: Please check my published papers. There is agreement with the SN1a data without assuming any lambda or omega.
@Johan Masreliez
Do you have a github repository where I can follow your calculation and reproduce your results?
I am sure you used this dataset. If not, could you use it such that we can compare apples and apples.
Supernova Survey Union2.1, http://supernova.lbl.gov/union/figures/SCPUnion2.1_mu_vs_z.txt.
did you use this definition for distance modulus? Please use it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_modulus
I will be happy to study your data analysis since it differs from my results.
Let me help you find your mistake, Johan.
The Marco-Pereira-Theorem is immortal:
"The larger the number of degrees of freedom of a model, the lower the value of its predictions."
A corollary of Marco-Pereira-Theorem is that:
With enough parameters, you can fit Mickey Mouse.
You should know that in general, this Marco-Pereira-Theorem is not even challenged. For instance, L-CDM introduces unsupported fitting variables, like Dark Matter and Dark Energy. That is the crap theory I am competing with.
That said, I am also referring to parameters in general. For example, QCD added an extra quantum dimension every time they couldn't fit a new particle into their taxonomy.
The point of Marco-Pereira-Theorem is that any theory with a number of parameters that is larger than another theory with a smaller number of parameters (while both explain all observable phenomena) is Less-Fundamental and should be discarded.
I don't know why you bothered to be sarcastic. What I said is the same as Occam Razor and it is the basis for Optimized Epistemology.
Why don't you just challenge me where it matters:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_I_get_this_simple_discovery_independently_verified
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Statistics
- Survey