Critical paradigm is a sort of emancipatory and transformatory research paradigm. Critical theorists take support from this approach to emancipate marginalized from their race class, gender, and religion (etc.) based flawed social systems (Asghar, 2013). Thus, it can be said that this critical strategy is used to voice the voiceless for social justice. Following this paradigm, researchers mostly use action research approach to achieve their goals. (Cohen, et al. 2000).
But if we use ethnographic methodology (which is based on constructivism) with critical paradigm, then how far can we achieve our goal of emancipation and social justice?
Ethnography is a methodology to voice people. Relying on constructivist paradigm, researchers often employ ethnography to understand the participants' culture from their own perspective.. but it also paves a way for researchers to voice the voiceless... Being an ethnographer, we cannot understand the process of construction of any social action without deconstructing it and when we deconstruct something, automatically we find its positive and negative aspects. Then, by criticizing the negative aspects we can create some space for marginalized...
In that way, it seems that we can use ethnographic (not purely ethnography) design as a technique to put forward our critical paradigmatic approach to emancipate suppressed people.
Kindly correct these ideas.