In a heterogeneous society, with many conflicting values and preferences, how do we achieve a consensus on the "common good" or the "good society"? Philosophers use a classic trick: the veil of ignorance. Is this a reasonable way to think about the "good society".
Please see Jean Tirole's new book with the title "economics for a common good". He has won the Nobel prize in economics.
That's Rawl's approach. Just one among others, I think. But certainly a very interesting one.
The veil of ignorance is very good but not 100% accurate "instrument", so it can not achieve consensus.
It may help remove or reduce self-serving bias. But people may also differ in the hierarchy of their values and in their beliefs, which also affect their decision-making.
Muhammad M Hammami I agree that the veil of ignorance is not perfect. It is always easier to curse the darkness rather than light a candle. Please suggest another protocol or mechanism or procedure that is as good as or better.
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Philosophy