Most likely, NOT. It won't "see" quite that far back in time.

https://www.yaabot.com/29808/the-james-webb-space-telescope-will-transform-our-view-of-the-universe/

The James Webb Space Telescope will most likely confirm that there was no sudden and instantaneous Big Bang singularity event. Rather, there were stages during which the material universe formed as the result of a rise in temperature throughout the universe, defined as a container full of space. Of the two choices, then, the idea of a quiet deployment of the material portion of the universe appears to be the most likely corroboration of astrophysical theory. However, neither of these two theories is likely to be the solution to the cosmological question, mainly because this material universe is constantly undergoing change, as galaxies form and merge, or die and are reborn out of primordial clouds of dust and gases resulting from the deterioration of some stars, for example, our sun, or else clouds of dust and gases resulting from the explosive activities of large stellar bodies, such as neutron stars. Currently, the prevailing theory discounts the Big Bang theory but as well the quiet deployment theory, in favor of the theory that the universe is a Cosmic Egg in which the Big Body of the Material Universe is continually and ceaselessly shifting and changing its configuration by turning in on itself. Succinctly stated in a brief scientific research article on the internet is the theoretical proposition that "The Big Bang is a really misleading name for the expanding universe that we see. We see an infinite universe expanding into itself. The name Big Bang conveys the idea of a firecracker exploding at a time and a place - with a center. The universe doesn't have a center. The Big Bang happened everywhere at once and was a process happening in time, not a point in time. We know this because 1) we see galaxies rushing away from each other, not from a central point and 2) we see the heat that was left over from early times, and that heat uniformly fills the universe." You can click on the source link and see the now familiar composite picture of this Cosmic Egg-Shaped Universe which is in a constant state of multidimensional flux, transformation, and self-fashioning!

Hans van Leunen

Thank you for this wonderful question!

"Can the James Webb telescope decide between a Big Bang and a quiet deployment of the universe?

Question

• Asked January 10

The Big Bang is a singularity. The universe is a dynamic continuum that can be described by field equations that are described by a quaternionic function, which uses a quaternionic number system as its parameter space. At the beginning of time, this function equals its parameter space. That parameter space is a flat stationary field. During runtime, his flat field can react on actuators that deform and expand the field or that vibrate the field. If this happens distributed over the full extent of the field, then the universe does not start with a huge explosion. Instead, it starts with a quiet development in which first the most elementary objects are generated and later conglomerates of these elementary modules are formed.

See https://vixra.org/author/j_a_j_van_leunen

Recommended

Best regards.

Nancy Ann Watanabe

Preston Guynn ,

Thank you for your wonderful answer!

"Preston Guynn added an answer

January 17

Your question statement is

• "Can the James Webb telescope decide between a Big Bang and a quiet deployment of the universe? The Big Bang is a singularity. The universe is a dynamic continuum that can be described by field equations that are described by a quaternionic function, which uses a quaternionic number system as its parameter space. At the beginning of time, this function equals its parameter space. That parameter space is a flat stationary field. During runtime, his flat field can react on actuators that deform and expand the field or that vibrate the field. If this happens distributed over the full extent of the field, then the universe does not start with a huge explosion. Instead, it starts with a quiet development in which first the most elementary objects are generated and later conglomerates of these elementary modules are formed."

There is an article titled 'NON-NEWTONIAN FORCES AND THE INVISIBLE MASS PROBLEM'[1] by J. R. Kuhn and L. Kruglyak which states

• "Experimental or observational tests of the 1/r2 gravitational force law are weak or nonexistent at length scales beyond the solar system. This is because at long distances all astrophysical estimates of mass density based on dynamics give larger values than corresponding measurements based on observed luminosity and local mass-to-luminosity ratios. The discrepancy generally increases with increasing distance, from galactic lengths to at least cluster scales near 10 Mpc, and is usually interpreted as evidence for missing mass. From an empirical perspective (that does not recognize the existence of dark matter unless it is nondynamically confirmed), we could equally well conclude that there are no significant constraints on possible spatial variations in Newton’s constant at large distances."

What this means is that calculations based on General Relativity (GR) and Newtonian gravitation do not apply at scales beyond our solar system. There is another article titled 'Puzzle with the precession of the neutron spin'[2] by V. Sulkosky et al., which includes more than one hundred authors from more than thirty research institutions which concludes that there is "a current lack of reliable quantitative descriptions of the Strong Interaction at the nucleon size scale, even for “gold-plated” observables such as δLT." This is to say that quantum chromodynamics is not producing results that allow caluclating probabilities of measurements of observables at the scale of the nucleus.

These two results mean that the big bang philosophical presupposition is without any basis in science. Without GR there is no theoretical framework for space time interactions beyond the scale of the solar system. Without QCD providing a basis for understanding neutrons and protons even in the lab today, there is certainly no basis for calculations of nucleosynthesis in the past or at other locations in the universse.

Such philosophical musings as big bang versus a quiet deployment of the universe are not scientifc, and nothing that astronomy could reveal will alter this condition. Furthermore, the presuppositon that looking at light coming from space is equivalent to looking back in time is unsubstantiated scientifically. The two-way speed of light is defined as c = 299792458 m/s, but the one way speed of light has not been thoroughly established, and light from other galaxies may well be traveling at the one-way speed of light. There is an analogy between gravitation and light. An article titled 'The speed of gravity — What the experiments say'[3] by Tom Van Flandern that states:

• "Laboratory, solar system, and astrophysical experiments for the 'speed of gravity' yield a lower limit of 2 × 1010c. The link between relativity and the causality principle involves issues of the meaning of gravitational waves and curved space-time analogies."

If the one way speed of gravity, and light, is greater than 2 x 1010 c, and light from other galaxies is traveling at this velocity toward our galaxy, then the imagined looking back in time is, like the rest of big bang postulates, without any basis in science.

Based on science instead of philosophy, your question is a wrong question and the train of thought leading to the question is on the wrong track altogether.

Best regards,

Preston Guynn

1) 'NON-NEWTONIAN FORCES AND THE INVISIBLE MASS PROBLEM' https://adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1987ApJ...313....1KRT

2) Puzzle with the precession of the neutron spin'

Preprint Puzzle with the precession of the neutron spin

3)The speed of gravity — What the experiments say'

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0375960198006501

Recommended

Share

• 2 Recommendations

Best regards.

Nancy Ann Watanabe

MY SOURCE LINK FOR QUOTE ON "AN INFINITE UNIVERSE EXPANDING INTO ITSELF":

https://webb.nasa.gov/content/features/bigBangQandA.html