First and foremost, the "big bang" was not an explosion at all, as many popular science commenters will gladly explain:

https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-space-astronomy-and-cosmology/history-of-the-universe/big-bang-expansion-not-explosion/

The fact that it was called "big bang" in the fist place was a mockery mainly against the theory's main developer Georges Lemaitre who wasn't only a cosmologist but also a jesuit priest. He never would have used that term, but somehow the mockery stuck with people (just like the Higgs Boson, aka the "goddamn particle", became "the god particle").

Pure quantum mechanics is certainly not enough, it's a quantum field theory / general relativity issue for it. A pure quantum mechanics equivalent formalism will definitely not suffice.

We assume that the universe began with all of its energy being trapped in a very small point.

This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and pushing it outwards to form the billions of galaxies in our vast universe.

Astrophysicists called this titanic explosion the Big Bang.

The quantum buzzle

---

Quantum Buzzles are actually quantum rules that apply to quantum particles in a vacuum.

We can call them quantum buzzles for two basic reasons:

i-These are not the same rules as the rules applied to material environments in classical physics and in some cases they are opposites.

ii-Quantum rules/Buzzles do not have a rigorous mathematical proof.

*The first rule/buzz applied to infinite free space is:

S(x,y,z,t)=Constant * V(x,y,z,t) . . . . (1)

Where S is the source/sink energy density term and V is the potential energy at the same node in 4D unit space (x, y, z, t)

Equation 1 is a clever breakthrough that leads to a simple solution of the numerical statistical equivalence of the Schrödinger equation.

To be continued.

The quantum buzzle -II

---

We recall that Quantum Buzzles are in fact quantum rules which apply to the energy density distribution of quantum particles (ψ^2(x,y,z,t) rather than ψ(x,y,z, t) itself in infinite free space.

**The second rule/buzz applied to infinite free space is:

V(x,y,z)at [∞] is equal to V(x,y,z)at [-∞] =0. . . . (2)

for all t.

Equation 2 is a clever breakthrough that expresses the fact that the quantum mechanical situation describes an isolated quantum particle system in infinite free space.

***The third rule/buzz applied to infinite free space is that full symmetry around midpoint M in 4D unit space is valid and expressed in the quantum transition matrix Q as,

Q(M+x,t)=Q(M-x,t) . . . (3)

for all x,t.

To be continued.

The quantum buzzle -III

Recall again that Quantum Buzzles are actually quantum rules that apply to the energy density distribution of quantum particles ψ^2(x,y,z,t) rather than ψ(x,y, z , t) itself in infinite free space. .

***The fourth and fifth rules/buzzles applied to Schrödinger's PDE in infinite free space as well as the heat diffusion equation in classical physics are that both operate in a discrete 4D unit space where time real t is completely lost and replaced by Ndt. Where N is the number of iteration repetitions and dt is the time jump.

It follows that:

i- A classic numerical statistical matrix B appears which is defined by,

U(x,y,z,t+dt)=B*U(x,y,z,t) . . . . (4)

ii- A quantum numerical statistical matrix Q appears expressed by,

U(x,y,z,t+dt)= Q*U(x,y,z,t) . . . . (5)

Note again that U(x,y,z,t) represents Ψ^2 rather than Ψ itself.

Equations 4 and 5 constitute an intelligent breakthrough which respectively describes the time-dependent matrix solution of the classical physics situation and the quantum numerical statistical matrix Q for an isolated quantum particle system in infinite free space.

The numerical statistical matrix B is well defined in many previous papers and the quantum numerical statistical matrix Q can also be well defined via a slight reformulation of the matrix B itself.

The analysis above reflects the fact that mother nature only has one face to show in classical and quantum physics.

To be continued.

The quantum buzzle IV

Quantum and vacuum dynamics

===

Here many physicists mix real science with fake science and fiction stories.

The old iron guards of the Schrödinger equation continue to deny the facts and dispel their flawed understanding of physics.

Question I,

Are Newotons' laws of motion and its law of gravity all valid in a vacuum?

The short answer is a big yes.

a) Newton's law of gravity

F=G*m1 m2/r^2

is valid in a vacuum

b) Newton's second law of motion in its general form,

F=d/dt (mv)

is valid in a vacuum.

Moreover, it is the only way to prove mass-energy equivalence [1],

E=mc^2

despite the denials of Schrödinger's iron guards.

1-A rigorous reformulation of Einstein's derivation of the theory of special relativity

February 2022, Researchgate and IJISRT review.

To be continued

I understood there is no proved, just a theory right? Considering there cannot be such thing than nothing (conservation of energy), it may have come out of something in different form (of existence?), maybe the universe has always existed and our brain is just not yet develop to grab how?

The quantum buzzle - V

Combining quantum mechanics and vacuum dynamics

----

Before the Big Bang, there existed space and time that constituted a unitary, four-dimensional void. This problem belongs to the Q matrix of quantum mechanics.

The statistics of Cairo techniques can prove in a simple way [1] that infinite vacuum alone and spontaneously can provide peak shape in 1D, 2D, 3D geometry (triangular shape) of energy density Ψ^2.

This analysis explains the formation of the Big Bang.

To be continued.

1-Volume 9, Number 3, March – 2024

IJISRT24MAR911

Schrödinger solution from Cairo Techniques

Equation – Time dependence

The quantum buzzle - VI

formation and explosion of the Big Bang

-----

Almost all physicists and mathematicians wrongly believe that the formation and explosion of the Big Bang can only be explained if quantum mechanics is combined with the theory of general relativity.

They are driven by the old iron guards of the Schrödinger equation.

The fact that the formation and explosion of the Bang can be explained via the theory of Cairo techniques combined with short-range weak and strong forces is explained below.

Just like the weak force, the strong force only acts when subatomic particles or energy density are extremely close to each other. They must be somewhere

Generally, the ratio of strong force to weak force under normal circumstances is 1:1 × 10 − 6. In other words, normally the strong force is one million times stronger than the weak force.

The probability of both forces appearing or lasting should also be 1/1 million.

Accordingly, Figure 1 explains the occurrence and duration of the Big Bang over millions or billions of years.

Fig 1. Occurrence and duration of the Big Bang over millions or billions of years.

To be continued.

Please take a look at:

Quantum buzzle, vacuum dynamics and the Big Bang

Research Gate and IJISRT.

It provides a clear answer.

It is easy to show that unified field theory belongs to the square of the Schrödinger wave equation rather than to the classical Schrödinger wave equation itself.

You first transform the Schrödinger PDE describing the wave function Ψ into another describing its square Ψ^2=Ψ. Ψ*. Strikingly, the modified Schrödinger PDE describing Ψ^2, when supplemented by the natural laws of vacuum dynamics, is more complete than the classical Schrödinger PDE itself.

The reformulated Schrödinger partial differential equation lives and operates in the 4D unit space and therefore belongs to the chains of the B matrix which is a product of the statistical method called Cairo techniques.

You can take a particular approach to show that unified field theory belongs to the square of the Schrödinger wave equation rather than the classical Schrödinger wave equation itself.

This particular approach focuses on applying B-matrix chain techniques to answer three fundamental questions that continually challenge the classic Schrödinger equation:

A-Can we replace Schrödinger's partial differential equation with a kind of statistical matrix mechanics capable of describing the formation and explosion of the Big Bang?

B-Can we deduce an expression for the reverberation time in audio rooms?

C-Is it possible to calculate a finite numerical integration via matrix mechanics?

Mathematicians and theoretical physicists with the greatest skills in the classical Schrödinger equation cannot answer these particular questions even in their dreams.

Finally, we present a correct and exact answer to the three questions A, B and C [1] proving that the unification of field theory is the square of the Schrödinger wave equation sublimated by the rules of vacuum dynamics .

1-Is unified field theory Schrödinger's wave equation or its square? A unitary spatio-temporal vision, ResearchGate, IJISRT journal, July 2024.