Would it be methodologically appropriate to scale predicted quantitative health impacts from climate change provided at national or regional levels to, say, the state level?

I'm interested in taking projections from studies such as

Fann, N., Nolte, C. G., Dolwick, P., Spero, T. L., Brown, A. C., Phillips, S., & Anenberg, S. (2015). The geographic distribution and economic value of climate change-related ozone health impacts in the United States in 2030. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995), 65(5), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.996270

and scaling those numbers for a single U.S. state.

More Steve Corbett's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions