If I want to assess the potential threat of cyber terrorism to the aviation industry of a state (consider 5 aspects: knowledge, awareness, vulnerabilities, response and impact) and have the officials (from the aviation industry) and experts (security experts) as my participants in hopes of providing a literature to contribute to helpjng decision-makers, policy makers to make policies or countermeasures to the threat of cyberterrorism in the future
What methodology can I use under a qualitative study?
I know this is something I should know already but I really need the opinion of other scholars.
#framework #qualitative #confusion
I recommend a combination of methodologies:
Semi-Structured Interviews: This method is useful for gaining detailed insights from industry officials and security experts. The flexibility of semi-structured interviews allows you to explore aspects like knowledge, awareness, vulnerabilities, response, and impact thoroughly.
Delphi Method: Useful for reaching consensus among experts on complex issues, the Delphi method involves iterative surveys, which can help understand diverse opinions about cyber terrorism threats and potential countermeasures.
Case Studies: Analyzing specific instances or scenarios of cyber incidents in the aviation industry can offer valuable insights into vulnerabilities and how effective responses have been managed.
Focus Groups: Conducting focus groups with various stakeholders in the aviation industry can help explore different perspectives, particularly in assessing awareness and knowledge levels.
Document Analysis: Reviewing existing policy documents, security protocols, and incident reports can provide historical and current perspectives on cyber security measures in the aviation sector.
Hello, a combination of the methodologies can greatly help based on your proposed aspects.
Thank you.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Statistics
- Survey