Better to do in CFX because we can see the flow particles and some pr contours, surely it will help to validate . 

@Rajasekarababu Kb

Dear Raj,

I am actually asking for good experimental data so I can use for CFD validations.

Cheers

Sheng

Dear Sheng,

What is the wing profile you are using. If it is some standard NACA profile, than you can compare your results with NASA results for that profile.

Regards,

Rohit

@Rohit Vashistha

Thanks.

Yes, I know some NACA report, I am actually asking for full vehicle aerodynamic data. Good wind tunnel data with hull only, hull+fins,hull+fins+gondola, hull+fins,hull+fins+gondola+propulsion. It is supposed difficult to get all the data. But even partial data will benefit my work.

See the attached document if it is of some help.

Hi!: it doesn't answer your question, but you may like having a look at the attached document from 1904, that describes an original approach to the desing of airships, it has handwritten comments from author, sorry, it's in Spanish, and belonged to the library of relatives to Leonardo Torres-Quevedo, an Spanish engineer, known from his: 'Chessplaying automat', and a cable cabin transport installed downstream from Niagara Falls. Good season, + salut