>>>we have 2 different and separate theory which are correct

The Special Theory of Relativity is not correct, because it is based on the wrong kind of transformations. See Preprint Memoir on the Theory of Relativity and Unified Field Theory

I already have the unifying theory: just use distributions theory; rewrite all laws of physics as functionals and by doing so singularities are avoided. The results are: so-called natural constants are not constant indeed, the universe is not a closed system in cosmos, there are more big bangs, time is 2-dimensional, i.e. spacetime is 5-dimensional, cosmos is an unlimited infinity.

Yes quantum theory and relativity can be sub-theories of single unified theory. To get this aim vacumm energy density should be the same as given by quantum theory and general relativity. To get the same density one can consider the vacuum energy density as given by quantum theory is the density of energy of the fundamental state of the electromagnetic field. One can consider the space-time as an infinite oscillators which have an average of energy as 1/2 hv0. This energy replace the energy "kT" in Planck black body theory. Than one consider vacuum as a black body filled with electromagnetic oscillaors in their fundamental states. So the total energy (or vacuum energy density) will be proportionnal to the forth power of v0. v0 will be declared as a new universal constant and wil have the value of 0.7 E12 Hz to get the same density of vacuum energy as given by general relativity i.e. about 1E-9 joules per cubec meter.

For more explanation this article in french (no more contradiction between QM and GR):

https://vixra.org/abs/2210.0079

Lev Verkhovsky

So , according to you the old Lorentz transformation which was used in STR is incorrect?

Paul Pistea

But only thing is considering time is 2-dimensional ,I.e. Space-time becomes 5-dimension is only abstract thing until we find the relation between 2-dimensional time with space. if we do so then all assumptions regarding this concept can be correct.

>>>the old Lorentz transformation which was used in STR is incorrect?

YES. Moreover, THREE great physicists made a mistake -- Lorentz, Poincaré and Einstein.

It is suggested that everything stems from gravity. This is discussed at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/quanta-from-newtonian-gravity-special-relativity-booklet-frisina/?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_publishing_post_edit%3BssR8wpOCSwmaOcmjMQftBQ%3D%3D&

dear Ritik Bhardwaj, there is nothing more to find out: it is about space (3 dimensions) and variation of space and variation of variation of space, ergo S^3xdSxd²S!!

They cannot be ...............

One ( relativity) is completely local

The other is by Bell's proof totally non-local

We are dealing with a world consisting of multiplicities of multiplicities in haecceities of myriads of event : Then , surprise , surprise ! we wanna unify them all !!

Thence, goes merely algorithmic rather than realistically topologic or algebraic .........

Olivier Denis

Dear Friend !

Wat is that so-called semi_Classical one ?

Reza Sanaye

Both theories are correlated, relativistic is used to explains quantum phenomenon like entangled particles etc...

In the perspective that both are completely different is little absurd. only difference that makes different is the sentence you said "world consisting of multiplicities of multiplicities in haecceities of myriads of event : Then , surprise , surprise ! we wanna unify them all !!" A probabilistic nature of quantum world.

Olivier Denis

thanks for elucidation .............

Yes. There is our 1 universe at all scales.

I suggest the trick is to view the common components of cosmology and quantum as the same. They are space-time, ether (and may other names) as a continuous substance that directs matter. and (2) matter that warps the first.

Then

Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE) unites the big, the small, and the four forces (GUT) by extending Newton's model

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344442808_Scalar_Theory_of_Everything_STOE_unites_the_big_the_small_and_the_four_forces_GUT_by_extending_Newton's_model

http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=2414

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YlJGdTvuTU

results.

No they can't be sub-theories as they are conceptually incompatible. I would go so far as to say that the experimental confirmation of one is always the falsification of the other.

A final theory to replace both should have no physical constants

There are two time dimensions and 3 spatial. Spacetime is 5D

M.U.E. Pohl

Being a physicist , when we describes something like phenomenon or something else we can take some random events that occurs in space-time. so if i ask you to explain me that event , you will explain that event by providing me a suitable theory related to that event.

So basically, if you provide me 2 different theory which explains that same event [ Both theories are completely different ] . Would be this right way to explain the event? No this is completely absurd , infact both should be a part of single theory which explain that event. [ if both theory are correct ]

Therefore, if we are trying to explain whole universe with a single theory , the thing we want is a unified theory, but here we have 2 different theories.

In this case,

Any one case should be true and other should be false.

Case 1:- One theory should be wrong.

Case 2:- Both theories are correct.

If case 1 is true, then it's simple , we just need to work with true theory to make a unified theory. If case 2 is true, then both theories [ both are different from each other ] must be the sub-theories of a single theory.

Similarly, in the case of quantum theory and relativity,

Either one should be wrong or both should be the part of single unified theory.

Ritik Bhardwaj

there are two time-dimensions in 5D spacetime in a final theory.

GR and QT use each one of them. Non of both use the correct two.

They are connected with concept Energy (information), so both of them are confirmed within their timeframe but conceptually one can not unite them.

Of course in some sense if a final theory is applied QT and GR somehow keep both correct in their aspects, so if you like one can say they will be part of a single unified theory. I depends on the point of view what is meant with "being part of".

M.U.E. Pohl

You are absolutely correct , if any one theory is wrong then other will be not part of unified theory, ofcourse another one will be itself unified one.

So yeah.. that will be not a part of theory.

I have done mistake over there.. Thankyou for correction..

Olivier Denis

Of course. I was doing random assumptions and imagining different cases if any one is wrong then what probably happens. just an opinion and nothing else...

Olivier Denis you wrote "In such a universe, intelligent life capable of manipulating technology could not emerge. "

I have no idea about the detailed logic behind this reasoning, but i would not disagree. My finding that spacetime is 5D leads directly to the conclusion that life itself is origin of universe. So yes, maybe life cannot emerge then is the counterpart of this finding.

Olivier Denis

So because N =3 and T = 1 our world is normal and not having probabilistic nature like Quantum world.

Olivier Denis you ask "what is the definition of life you use,....?"

i use no definition for this concept. Anyway it would be a real definition and not a nominal. I suggest a living universe in that the free will of the universe as a living being is not predictable but the free will of the observer (us) can be represented by calculation.

Man is a living being. He represents life. Man consists of supposedly inanimate entities... atoms, energy quanta. But life takes place below the materially tangible layer. We comprehend the world through the physical dimensions of space and time, where time is linked to the concept of causality. These physical dimensions reflect our perception, where our perception represents "life". The dimensions of space and time are thus themselves an expression of "life".

I don't know if i could agree on your idea that time is unidirectional. Causality is unidirectional for sure. But time has the aspect of causality and of movement. One must consider that those two concepts should not be mixed up.

Mixing causality with time is the reason why we use 1D time because there is only one Causality. But movement needs two dimensions of time both of them not mixed up with causality.

Olivier Denis

i do see the logic, that trying to combine QT and GR is only possible by the concept of Information (representing Energy).

I agree, that my answer not using a definition for life is strange since in fact of course i use a definition for life and i gave it at the same time arguing not using a definition. I think i meant i use no nominal definition.

I would argue, that the physical dimensions of space and time, those we use to perceive the universe with, are representation of being alife. Because the observer (us) is alive, the observed is alive. Life therefore exists below the layer of measurements and substance.

I could label it "living universe" or "God" but i can't give a nominal definition for God.

Olivier Denis

in my dimensional analysis Force is m^5/s^5 and Energy is m^6/s^5

Having force to be in balance (symetry) (information = 0) there is one degree of freedom that energy represents as "time" in a sense of a physical quality "information." I see no contradiction. Do you?

Olivier Denis "can you reformulate this sentence..."

i try to formulate it in another way:

in essence, my suggestion for a final theory is to understand pi not as n-gon with infinite n and given in no or calculated in dimension "length", but given as dimension "time/length"

So Pi = 1 (second / meter) and never ever we should use pi = 3.14..... in physics.

QT and GR both are build upon the idea that pi = 3.14...... So they both include the concept of "infinity" (Information)

And this is the common point.

The problem with pi = 3.14.... is, that it is calculated by relating dimension "length" (circumference) to one another (diameter) while using the number without physical dimension in physics although it must have a phyiscal dimension. If we adress a physical dimension, then we are not allowed to use the concept of infinity within pi.

Olivier Denis "information" is not defined as a physical quality except maybe one can understand the mol (amount of substance) as such?

I would define Information to be a finite number specitying the quantity of a specitied physical quality. In spacetime information can be "20 (number) meter (quantity) length (quality)" or "10 Billion seconds time" If we define time (or space) to be infinite (we have to wait infinite days to measure this) and this results in "infinite" information.

If one understand pi calculated in dimenion length (space) only, it contains infinite information by definition.

Olivier Denis we use 7 physical qualities (7 Definitions). https://www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units

I don't understand to which quality you relate the concept "information". I think in QM this is related to both "space" and "time".

Can you be more precise on how you relate information to either space or time ?

Olivier Denis i would not disagree with such duality.

The point i add is that we use irrational mathematics / phyiscs in QT and GR at the moment we use pi as dimensionless number and that leads to entaglement as fundamental property. But i think the fundamental property of spacetime is, that we use irrational pi as its origin not adressing this irrational approach in the very origin of our concept to describe the universe

We are use to multiply and devide dimension of length.

4 Meter * 5 Meter = 20 Meter2 (surface)

20Meter2/ 5 Meter = 4 Meter (line)

Today we use Pi as a representation without adressing that it must be given in dimension Meter / Meter

But, what is Meter / Meter in physical terms? Nothing?

10 Meter / 2 Meter = 5 ?

10 Meter / 2 Meter = 5 "times" (2 Meter)

(a length is transformed into dimension time)

2 Meter * 5 times = 10 Meter

(a time is transformed into a length)

2 Meter * 5 Meter = 10 Meter2

in a final theory "Pi" = 1 second / 1 meter therefore should be used as the definition of time instead using the caesium-atom and the speed of light.

In my work i found that using pi = 1 period of time / 1 unit of length, then the speed of light as a constant turns out to represent the circumference of earth related to the rotation duration of earth around own axis. And in the origin 1793 in France the meter of length and the second of time were defined on the basis of the earth rotation and the circumference of earth. Therefore i am quite convinced about the appoach of using pi = 1 as a final theory.

PS: Human beings do have two eyes because there are two dimensions of time as per convention on how we perceive 3D spatial.

Olivier Denis yes, but information is only a topic in 4d Spacetime on which QT and GR both grounded. In 5D information and energy is Zero because of symetry.

The problem with a final theory is, from a psychological point of view, no one will accept it because a final theory will prove that everything we did in our life and believed in up to now was wrong. Our self-image (ego) is constructed to fend off such fundamental disturbing new information

In general relativity, events are continuous and deterministic, meaning that every cause matches up to a specific, local effect. In quantum mechanics, events produced by the interaction of subatomic particles happen in jumps (yes, quantum leaps), with probabilistic rather than definite outcomes.

Special relativity demands a locality principle (no instantaneous action at a distance); locality implies Bell's theorem; quantum mechanics violates Bell's inequality, therefore, quantum mechanics contradicts relativity!

This is where a unification of three fundamental physical constants could occur: Planck's constant, originating from quantum mechanics; Newton's gravitational constant from classical gravitation; and the speed of light, which Einstein proved to be constant through general relativity.

No unified field theory has broad support among physicists, though progress has been made toward unifying some of the forces.

Stephen I. Ternyik "quantum mechanics contradicts relativity"

I agree. QM falsifies GR and GR falsifies QM

"This is where a unification of three fundamental physical constants could occur: Planck's constant, originating from quantum mechanics; Newton's gravitational constant from classical gravitation; and the speed of light"

My findings in dimensional problems due to Errors in SI Units suggest also that there is a fundamental problem with plancks constant.

Plancks constant wrong (as used today) is Dimension [Joule s] = [m 6 / s4]

Plancks constant correct is dimension [kg-1 s] = [s 4 / m4]

which shows a fundamental incompatible (inverse) understanding of the concept of Energy in GR vs QM

Quantum Mechanics luck an universal constant: it is the average of the energy of the fundamental state of quantum field (or the electromagnetic field, or the ZPE average at zero kelvin). The black body theory of Planck is incomplete we should add to the Planck formulae a similar formulae for the Zero Point Energy and so we introduce a new universal constant in the second member. At T=0K the first member vanishes and the integration of the second member gives us exactly the energy density of vacuum as given by General Relativity: the way for unification and eventually extracting energy from vacuum is open: we undrestand vacuum.

To understand vacuum---most probably as "carrier" GRUND of Z.P.E. ---necessitates opening Faults on any topological space whose vibratory effects are transduced down to adjacent planes . Autonomous oscillators produce periodic signals without any external frequency reference. Zero-point energy corrections are rarely provided in the literature. When Planck introduced the 1/2 hv term to his 1911 black body equation he showed that there is a residual energy remaining at zero degree K after all thermal energy ceased. Other investigators, including Lamb, Casimir, and Dirac added to this information. Today zero point energy (ZPE) is accepted as an established "Topos" . (( A new approach for preventing zero-point energy (ZPE) violation in quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) simulations is presented. ))

The force versus extension curves generated by single molecule technique have NOT been routinely used to describe the entropic elasticity of any such Grund-Topos .

Olivier Denis

dilation of "carrier" GRUND of Z.P.E." is the result of info flux down the gradient of energy from superposed states of momenta

This actually violates law of thermodynamics, AND law of entropy but not the arrow of time

Vacuum energy in quantum field theory, being the sum of zero-point energies of all field modes, is formally infinite but yet, after regularization or renormalization, can give rise to finite observable effects. One way of understanding how these effects arise is to compute the vacuum energy in an idealized system such as a large cavity divided into disjoint regions(( we have accomplished this in our own labs ))

Olivier Denis

the baseline energy level regarding its density not per space but per time is one of the best indicators of carrier" GRUND of Z.P.E.'s intensity of energy harvest . Here , we are NOT moving in the direction of increase of disorderly outflow of info , but rather moving on a Constant plane of tangency [ tangent to a dilated environment named the core-crystal of energy dissemination , though remember : it is not a crystal . . . this is just a name accorded to it ] .......Which (( this plane of tangency)) periodically changes and shifts the more-than-one-point of tangency to carrier" GRUND of Z.P.E.'s intensity in 4D Spacetime Manifold , while it maintains only one point of tangency to carrier" GRUND of Z.P.E.'s intensity in 3D Newtonian Absolute Space ..........

motile solutions of matrices with self-regulating systematics of energy load to Sub-zero-fields are manifested as and when our Universe shrinks in spatiality to release further outflux of such Constant planes per unit of energy given out . The adjacency and Laplacian matrices and their eigenvalues and energies of the general product characterizes balance and computes expressions for the Laplacian eigenvalues and Laplacian energy on the (Sub-)grids of ZPE . The absorption-release energy function would be an exponential one somewhat like Urbach energy's behaviour .

Olivier Denis

In your overly simplified physics , maybe likely it cant explain the situation to you

But willy-nilly , physics has evolved to be more attentive to COMPLEX systems

This I have not mandated :

Fact is that intensit(ies) of energy harvest are NOT moving in the direction of increase of disorderly outflow of info , but rather moving on a Constant plane of tangency [ tangent to a dilated environment......... ]

you prefer not to see this as explanation on matters of entropy ? Why ?

Now YOU explain, plzz . . . maybe likely I shall learn something from you ########

respectfully

reza

Olivier Denis

This is YOUR take . .. you may interpret my words that way . . .I have gone great length to help you , sir****

just your habit : To "oversimplify" things . ... even on those people's words who try to show you the postmodern trend(s) in physics ,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Reza Sanaye

Olivier Denis

You both has different opinions about same thing. if we ask question to a scientist mostly he says his own opinion has an answer. In theoretical physics mostly there is no actual and accurate answer of something , there will be some uncertainty that's why every scientist will have little different opinions about same thing infact mot of them are correct...

Since both theories under consideration are axiomatic - of course they can - provided that new reconciling axioms are introduced. The simplest and trivial version is the axiom of switching from one axiomatic to another when a certain contradiction is reached.

Of course, when inventing matching axioms, one should not forget that the axioms of different QM interpretations are not the same.

Olivier Denis ""There is no proof of truth, only of non-truths...""

Truth arises from consent/agreement. When two people establish a truth by convention, it can be proven. In contrast, "non-truths" can't be proven because outside truth (convention) everything is "non-truth".

Olivier Denis "we have 2 different and separate theory which are correct

Quantum theory and Relativity"

No, both theories "seem" to be correct, because there are in fact two different conventions (definitions) on how to measure the length in space. There are two mistakes

1,) Both of them are incorrect in terms of being "irrational" (not accessible to the mind)

2. ) only one would be allowed

"However, since this necessity is ignored by BIPM and "current science", there is a state in basict heoretical physics in which either time or length in space are to be understood as "double"defined. Because either it follows from three "natural constants" (e.g. fcs133, R∞. and c) that the length is defined twice or it turns out that the duration is doubly defined....

However, since a nominal definition of a physical quantity and unit also represents the measurement specification for this physical quantity, two different measurement specificationsmust not exist, since their identity would not be falsifiable." (PDF) Errors In The International System Of Units (SI). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364720560_Errors_In_The_International_System_Of_Units_SI [accessed Nov 04 2022]."

Olivier Denis

"According to some prominent researchers in emergent gravity (such as Mark Van Raamsdonk) spacetime is built up of quantum entanglement.

This implies that quantum entanglement is the fundamental property that gives rise to spacetime."

Quantum entanglement is when 2 particles are entangled in order to obey conservation rule, from above researcher statement you have mentioned is true then we can simply say that space-time exists only to save conservation rule of universe, looks like scientific philosophy but this can be true..

"Quantum field theory in curved spacetime is a semiclassical approximation to quantum gravity theory, where the curved background spacetime is treated classically, while the matter fields in the curved spacetime are quantized."

So, Semiclassical approximation is something which we can say it is a common from Quantum mechanics and theory of relativity. By using this approximation we can develop unified theory.

""""information as it is a quantum state change is due to the modification of one degree of freedom from the considered quantum system.""""

Can you elaborate more about information , i wanna more about this...

UNITY:

"According to some prominent researchers in emergent gravity (such as Mark Van Raamsdonk) spacetime is built up of quantum entanglement.

This implies that quantum entanglement is the fundamental property that gives rise to spacetime."

For a simple harmonic oscillator in black body theory the oscillator exchange energy with vacuum exited and the vacuum exited exchange energy with the oscillator: one can say that the real electromagnetic field is a status of exicited vacuum: this is entanglement in black body theory.

When the temperature of the black body reach zero Kelvin, it still exist energy into the black body and this energy is exactly the lowest fundamental state of the electromagnetic field . Its integration gives the energy density of vacuum and this energy is of course an universal constant: it is exactly equal the energy density of vacuum as given by the theory of gravitation enen thought General relativity or the classical theory considered as an approximation for low speed of the first.

HELLO EVERYBODY: PHYSICS IS UNITED.

Thanks Olivier for this discussion:

"Use quantum information — in particular, the amount of entanglement between different parts of the state, as measured by the mutual information — to define a “distance” between them.

Parts that are highly entangled are considered to be nearby, while unentangled parts are far away."

One can say in other manner:

"Entanglement in black body is higher when the exicited states of vacuum are higher and than the exchange of energy & power between Planck resonators and vacuum is in its high rate or in classical terms the most probable. Entanglement in a black body is lower when the exicited states of vacuum are lower and than the exchange of energy & power between Planck resonators and vacuum is in its lower rate or in classical terms the most improbable." Of course it is evident that the entaglement rich two maximums the first is concerning about entaglement between energy of oscillators en energy of the exicited vacuum and the second is between exchanged power between the oscillators and the exicited vacuum. This exchange is always random.

"So, Semiclassical approximation is something which we can say it is a common from Quantum mechanics and theory of relativity. By using this approximation we can develop unified theory."

One can say:

" So the theory of information is the Scholastic ElectroDynamics .The unified theory is simply the SED thoery".

I can't found my other replies.

One can conclude that space-time or 04-dimenions geometry is energy. The coefficient kappa between the geometry of space-time and the tensor of real energy (matter and fields) is a coefficient of entaglement between matter and the multi states of vacuum. Eventhough there is not real matter & fields, space-time continue to exist due to the fundamental state of vacuum at zero Kelvin that is why the energy of the fundamental state is an universal constant.

May I point out that wrong physical units cannot be reconciled at all. From my analysis, QT and GR operate with an inversely proportional mass, plain and simple. You can of course standardize it with information or something similar, but it's just irrational to set kg = kg-1

Entanglement is none other than topological "suturing" of two points in point set topology as for events whose information value is { thermodynamically\energetically } disentropic to one another .

Olivier Denis

You got it exactly right , Sir ....................

We have repeatedly arranged ( with 7.5% level of error ) entangled\non-entangled particles and molecules in our biophysics lab .............

The topology is right as you have understood it ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Olivier Denis

So for particles which are entangled at high distance between them is considered unentangled , it mean entangled decrease if distance between particle increases ?

it's really confusing...

Olivier Denis

"At absolute zero there is only 1 microstate possible (Ω=1) and ln(1) = 0.

and it s consistent with Mass bit of Information at T = 0K so as expected, no information can exist at zero absolute, mbit= 0 at T = 0K."

I agree with you : a black body can't emit energy at T=0K because the Planck theory of the black body is based on the Classical Single Harmonic Oscillator (CSHO). The mean energy of the CSHO is of course equal to kT and when T=0K this energy is equal to zero and so according to the theory of information theory the mass of a bit is equal to zero.

Let's take a Quantum Single Harmonic Oscillator (QSHO). According to Shrodinger equation the lowest energy of the QSHO (in its fundamental state n=0)is not equal to zero. Let's take a black body at T=0K, the energy of every oscillator in it taken as a QSHO is not equal to zero so the total density of energy of the black body is not equal to zero and it is finite otherwise the black body will collapse under gravitation. For the QSHO one can define the mean energy of the electromagnetic field in its fundamental state at T=0K as 1/2hv0. This energy will replace "kT" in the Planck theory of black body. Integrate to all frequencies the total energy density of vacuum will be proportionnal to the forth power of the frequency v0 and this is exactly equal to the vacuum density of energy as given by the theory of gravitation (General relativity and its classical approximation). This gives us a frequency v0=700 Ghz. If you calculate the mass of a bit as m.c2=1/2hv0 you get the mass of every bit of space time at T=0K.

Are there any contradiction with the theory of information? the response is NO. Information can exist eventhought at T=0K: for the black body theory th CSHO haven't spin so the information can't exist. For the QSHO it have spin and the black body is fitted with electrons and electromagnetic field which have spins. At T=0K there is many possible orientations of the spins (so many possible microstates) and so the entropy can exist eventhought it be considered as negative.

Of if the energy density of vacuum is multiplied by c/4 we get the Pointing vector but its mean value is equal to zero because the field is oriented everywhere but if we are able to polarise the field we hope that we can extract energy from "nothing".

Every corpuscle is entangled to vacuum in a "reservoir " as the energy lost by the corpuscule is in the reservoir and to conserve its energy, the corpuscule take the same amount of energy from the reservoir in a perpetual manner.

I would add something : the entropy of vacuum at T=0K is not equal to zero as per Nerst theorem or the the third law of thermodynamics. It is very easy to conclude that the entropy given by Planck formulae as in his article of 1901 applied to the fundamental state of the electromagnetic field when the frequency of this field approches its mean energy v0=0.7 E12 Hz is exactly equal to the Boltzmann constant i.e.:

S0=k (the entropy of vacuum at T=0K).

That' s why atoms exists eventhought at T=0K. For Nerst the entropy is equal to zero so the distance between particles will be zer so the density of matter in a cristal will be infinite and Nature had horror from infinite quantities.

Olivier Denis

True , because in body at absolute zero no process occurs. i.e. all atoms will be static and this is impossible.

There is absolute zero while the distance among particles is not zero , either . As non-accelerated manner of temperature dropping down differs from particles' cold collapse under the rule of probable Multiplicities of Universe(s) , infinite localities would have been provided for [ even observational ] blast of space compactification and space , ie , micro-space expanding with almost the same level of disorder . Disorder , thence , does not always grow to the inflation of spatial bubbles . Such bubbles are NOT of Spatiotemporal nature .. . they are merely of spatial nature . .. . ten to the power minus 27 meters would , in that case , be the particle distances in absolute zero .

Very Dear Olivier Denis

Yes

You are right when you say The most accepted version of the third law of thermodynamics is the unattainability principle

Now:

This law is the self-styled upgraded version of one of the olden idea in physics

When you come to spatiality alone instead of spatiotemporality , then :

There is absolute zero while the distance among particles is not zero , either . As non-accelerated manner of temperature dropping down differs from particles' cold collapse under the rule of probable Multiplicities of Universe(s) , infinite localities would have been provided for [ even observational ] blast of space compactification and space , ie , micro-space expanding with almost the same level of disorder . Disorder , thence , does not always grow to the inflation of spatial bubbles . Such bubbles are NOT of Spatiotemporal nature .. . they are merely of spatial nature . .. . ten to the power minus 27 meters would , in that case , be the particle distances in absolute zero .

spacetime is already a "dead" ideological [ metaphysical ] concept . ................

The speed of flashlight in vacuum for sure is constant, but not speed of natural light that is NOT CONSTANT

Article Title: Science is wrong on…Light & Photon

Javad Fardaei

Do you have any practical proof regarding your statement "The speed of flashlight in vacuum for sure is constant, but not speed of natural light that is "NOT CONSTANT" ? because To believe in the basis of theoretical is difficult for such claims.

QT and RT are sub-theories when using distributions theory to avoid singularities and if RT axiom (light speed in vacuum is constant) is changed. Speed of light is not constant. That is exactly what I did: see my work published here on RG (too).

Paul Pistea

Right if we avoid some theory , then they will be considered sub-theories of unified theory..

The theory that brings together all the different fields of physics, the electromagnetic force, the atomic structure, gravity, and beyond that even the genetic code, the base pair system and the DNA double helix etc. etc. is the theory of the Menorah Matrix. Basically, all the universe's structures and phenomena are based on the Fibonacci sequence (from which the golden ration emerges) and the base-10 number system and precisely its inner-dimension where the patterns, or better, the repeating patterns that makes the basis for the operating systems of nature are based on.

Presentation Menorah Matrix - The Archetype of the Structures and Phenome...

The search for a unified theory where others are "under" it is a very autocratic one . I wonder why various ways of thought at various "Locales" are not to be heard out loud ?? !!

Universities have been created to teach us ( and to flourish) "variety" in scientific & in humanistic terms . Where digital Capitalism's mono-unification of the globalization progremme is bashing every single personal trait of ours , scientists , too , have been accorded with the task to even more unify things . . . . .

We need to know more about them. According to the latest research, the three basic microscopic interactions have been unified and born within the vacuum expected value, and above the vacuum expected value, gravity is unique. Think what that means! Please refer to：

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360724807_Perfection_of_the_standard_model_-_derivation_of_the_grand_unified_node_normalization_of_the_mass_coupling_constant_and_treatment_of_the_magnetic_moment_anomaly_of_simple_particles