There seems to be a build up of quasi-electrostatic energy during the process of mitosis that continues until the centromere bond at the centre of the chromosome ruptures causing the two chromatids to fly apart. This may release UV radiation and neutrons(?)

No, it's a nuclear process, but

not in the sense you have in mind.

https://phys.org/news/2012-02-mitosis-mystery-chromosomes-align-perfectly.html

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-11-gain-insight-chromosome.html

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-11/uoc--cda111309.php

Protons have a biological use, they

sometimes function as neurotransmitters.

https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/proton-joins-elite-club-of-cellular-messengers/3003336.article

Regards,

Joachim

Many thanks Joachim

I'll have a good read and get back to you later.

kind regards Tony

Dear Joachim

I'm thinking neutrons in the body would be very hard to detect since they are neutral particles and very easily reabsorbed within the body (mean free path of a few cms); protons are a different matter and much easier to detect.

As far as UV is concerned it seems the DNA might be stretched by quasi-electrostatic fields acting as a dipolar force. This is a Stark Effect turning the circular orbits to elliptical orbits. If when rupture eventually occurs there is a chemical or nuclear equation that describes the rupture of the bond.

(there's a similar equation in atmospheric science and I think neutrons can be detected) 

But what is it?

In order to create neutrons, high voltages

are necessary. But where should they come

from? A comb in one's hair?

Here is the story about neutrons in

the air, but again, high voltages are

needed to accelerate particles.

https://phys.org/news/2005-09-neutrons-born-lightning.html

https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.125001

Biological tissue might emit

UV photons, but where would

be the advantage?

Regards,

Joachim

Dear Joachim I can see the biochemical viewpoint in your answers. But have you ever thought about how the endogenous fields might be involved in microbiology?

There are some new ideas about diffusion and resonances within the cell cycle. UV seems to be involved in radiation from chromosomes for advantageous reasons including evolution. (I'll add a link in a few minutes)

best regards Tony 

I'm aware of a strange experiment by Luc Montagnier et al.

Beaming of DNA information by electromagnetic waves.

But I think it was an observation error. For me this

sounds too odd.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/423827/how-bacteria-could-generate-radio-waves/

https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01620

Regards,

Joachim

Hi  Joachim 

see the various papers under A.H.J. Fleming (pseudonym for Tony Fleming)

https://www.researchgate.net/researcher/2052785043_A_H_J_Fleming

What this all says is that biofields are a level underneath the fractal structure of biochemistry and hence they cannot be studied using voltages as in quantum theory but rather via proper field measurements. You'll also see that biodiversity is related to a resonance condition and not to random fluctuations as in your paper about the bacteria; you'll see a relationship to the bacterial size and the cosmology of Earth in our Galaxy; apparently this resonance is used on which to base life in a solar system. 

All a long way from whether there are neutrons inside the body. I'm also wondering if a fast proton can become a slow neutron within the body?

kind regards Tony

Joachim

I've been looking at the paper you suggested about protons in chemistry world 

 https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/proton-joins-elite-club-of-cellular-messengers/3003336.article

"Erik Jorgensen and colleagues at the University of Utah wanted to understand the mechanism underlying the rhythmical contraction of the digestive muscles of the tiny round worm C. elegans, an organism that is a popular model for biological studies. 

By screening for mutant worms where muscle contraction is impaired, Jorgensen’s team identified the pathway by which the intestine signals to the surrounding muscle - a signal that the researchers showed is not transmitted by nerve cells. 

Image showing location of proton-binding proteins on gut muscle of C. elegans

Every 50 seconds a wave of calcium ions is released from internal storage compartments in the cells of the intestine. The calcium ions activate proteins in the gut wall that act as proton pumps - catapulting protons out of the cell."

What is interesting is that these worms turn up in the hunt for 'holocentromeres' where centromeric structures are found along the entire chromosome and not at a single  centromere somewhere near the centre of the chromosome.

Not sure what this all means but interesting.

Just an idea: the pistol shrimp produces

cavitation bubbles. Aren't there people

who claim this way nuclear fusion could

be ignited?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpheus_heterochaelis

Regards,

Joachim

Sorry for the delay in replying Joachim

Good lateral thinking; I'll come back to you, but this you think could perhaps be evidence of sonoluminescence? Fusion reactions could be involved in biological phenomena?? Interesting stuff indeed

best regards Tony

There's also another line of research into cosmic and solar events and congenital abnormalities:

http://www.mnu.edu/crossroads/article/a-link-between-solar-events-and-congenital-malformations

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1503/1503.02576.pdf

With regard to my links yesterday, it seems to me that there's two forms of nuclear energy that we should be thinking about: fusion, and fission.

Fusion seems to be a deterministic effect while fission is a chaotic, random effect. 

So while fission might be able to cause congenital abnormalities by randomly breaking DNA bonds via an avalanche reaction, perhaps fusion can be part of a biological process that doesn't cause detrimental effects? Perhaps the DNA itself undergoes this form of reaction within the cell cycle with a combination of acoustic and EM fields forming a fusion effect.

So perhaps not the centromeres but the small DNA bonds (0.34 nm) when transcription is known to be used in copying the daughter chromatids to form the new chromosomes.

We find acoustic and electromagnetic fields within the cell cycle. (see https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michal_Cifra) and these are known to Self-Field Theory as the basis of gluons and quarks.

It may be that this form of nuclear fusion has a very small radius of effect unlike our knowledge of fission where the radius can be as big as a city.

Certainly we don't normally think of nuclear energy inside biological systems.

Our current scientific knowledge talks about 'melting' of the chromatids into two single strands of DNA and this implies a temperature rise which the conductivity vs frequency relationship also indicates that as frequency rises conductivity of a tissue rises and this causes a temperature rise. But this could be just the in vitro way of 'melting' the chromatids while the cell cycle may be a tiny fusion reaction??

Can anyone tell me if this 'melting' is seen in vivo?

It seems that unless we find a source of energy from somewhere ELSE inside a biological system we don't have enough energy to produce neutrons; end of story.

But this search for neutrons has all been connected with a search for neutrons inside Christ's body.

(See https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316636164_Chromosome_acting_as_loop_antenna_matches_wavelength_for_coloration_of_Shroud_of_Turin)

If for instance ALL cells in Christ's body performed mitosis then perhaps there WOULD be sufficient energy to produce neutrons. 

Conference Paper Chromosome acting as loop antenna matches wavelength for col...

To get an idea to the problem you mentioned it would be useful to have a new idea about  a mechanism why a nucleus ejects a neutron at all. Such a new idea is sketched in the project goal of Hypotron Theory  

https://www.researchgate.net/project/Hypotron-Theory