Yes sir, International law can adapt to such challenges, but its adaptation is still limited and uneven. The rise of borderless conflicts presents complex legal questions related to accountability, attribution, and the definition of force. Although core principles remain applicable, the current legal frameworks are not fully equipped to regulate these evolving threats. For international law to remain effective, it requires clearer norms, updated mechanisms, and stronger international cooperation to address the legal gaps posed by emerging technologies.
There are conventions, international treaties, protocols, agreements, etc., multilateral and bilateral, regional, international organizations (ex, UN), and other mechanisms. In all countries that sign and ratify something like this, these documents have priority and are called "international legislation". You just don't understand the subject matter.
If your parliament or president signs an accession to an international document, it means that "international legislation" exists. Ask lawyers, contact international lawyers. I see you obviously haven't dealt with this topic and that's why you're offended.
Legislation is not process or results. Legislation is a document with provisions and prescriptions for what to do in a certain situation (ask Google or any AI).There are many international documents on risk insurance, liability, and agreements. Conduct a literary search, contact competent organizations or the Faculty of Law. Government employees should know how to work with this topic. There are questions about determining the origin of threats from countries, etc.
Phil Geis Oh, wow! You've really cracked the code on international law! I’ll admit, I didn’t realize that "international law" was a mystical concept, no borders, no legislatures, just pure imagination. 🧙♂️ But hey, if "BS" were a legal term, I guess you’d be the first to draft the No International Law Bill.
Thanks for the insight, though! I’ll make sure to “invest my thoughts” wisely in the future...maybe in something like, I don’t know, "How to win an argument without invoking ad hominem?" 😄
Hope you find the International Absence of Law more interesting than the rest of us do!
Phil Geis Yeah- it is my platform and I am well within my rights to post whatever comments- you might have some personal issues with IL, but truth cannot be hidden. Everything has positive and negative aspects, so does IL.
No one questions your petulant ad hominem. - it is your platform.
Still, I'll make one more attempt to help you - as I did with Dimitry.
Start with reality - not a false premise, not a cartoonish version of the world. There is no international law - just a loose collection of treaties, agreements, a corrupt world court few major countries recognize, etc. that rarely if ever handle conflicts. International legislation is an even greater bit of pompous silliness.
To the point, UN has addressed the subject (Why didn''t you do this little bit of homework? Dmitry the expert failed to observe). More useless than the useless Paris agreement.