As a classical nuclear dye, DAPI exhibits relatively limited cell membrane permeability, and its staining efficiency varies depending on cell type. While it may provide satisfactory nuclear staining for certain cell lines, others may show reduced staining due to differences in membrane permeability. For live-cell nuclear staining applications, it is recommended to use specialized dyes (e.g., HY-15559) designed for live cells, as their optimized membrane permeability ensures more consistent and uniform staining results.
The answer to this question comes from MCE Technical Support.
DAPI binds to DNA by intercalating into the minor groove of the double helix (it binds poorly to single-stranded DNA) and has the highest affinity for A-T–rich regions. DAPI can pass through intact cell membranes and is generally considered a vital dye (really, as for me, not so good for living cells).
It can be substituted with Hoechst 33342 or Hoechst 33258. In my opinion, Hoechst 33342 is the better choice — it is less toxic than DAPI and, due to an additional ethyl group, it penetrates cells more effectively than Hoechst 33258.
DAPI can be used to stain the nuclei of live cells, but it requires a higher concentration. This is because the cell membrane is more permeable to DAPI in dead or dying cells, while live cells have a more intact membrane that can hinder its entry. Live cell staining typically requires higher concentrations (around 10 µg/ml). I would not recommend DAPI for live cell staining because DAPI's ability to penetrate intact cell membranes is limited, so staining efficiency is generally lower for live cells.
Hoechst 33342 is often preferred as a more effective and cell-permeable nuclear stain for live cells because for staining live cells, the dye needs to reach the nucleus to bind to DNA. Moreover, compared to other DNA dyes, Hoechst 33342 generally exhibits lower toxicity to cells, allowing for longer observation periods and minimizing adverse effects on cellular processes.