Namely, studies specifically investigating and positively evidencing associatedness of high expertise with predominantly "bottom-up" cognitive learning-strategies? (My thanks to all !)
Developing a Cognitive Training Strategy for First-Episode Schizophrenia: Integrating Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches. Nuechterlein KH, Ventura J, Subotnik KL, Hayata JN, Medalia A, Bell MD. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2014 Jul;17(3):225-253
Theta-gamma coupling reflects the interaction of bottom-up and top-down processes in speech perception in children. Wang J, Gao D, Li D, Desroches AS, Liu L, Li X. Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 15;102 Pt 2:637-45.
Top-down controlled and bottom-up triggered orienting of auditory attention to pitch activate overlapping brain networks. Alho K, Salmi J, Koistinen S, Salonen O, Rinne T. Brain Res. 2014 Dec 31. pii: S0006-8993(14)01757-0.
Disentangling the Role of Corticobasal Ganglia Loops in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Visual Attention: An Investigation of Attention Deficits in Parkinson's Disease.
Tommasi G et al. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Dec 16:1-23.
Book Bottom-up and top-down processes in reading : influences of ...
Article Bottom-up or top-down in dream neuroscience? A top-down crit...
Article Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the ...
This is an absolutely first-class set of differing topical perspectives on which to proceed, each of them addressing some aspect I have identified as crucially important to the theoretical work I have been developing on the generalization of expertise to different domain-related abilities and contexts evident in elite-level pianists.and exceptionally gifted students. Inferring from your list, would I be correct in guessing your own research interests revolve around much the same basic theme as mine?
I have some general "Barsalou suggestions... " They seem mostly a theory but they deal a lot with evidences, as Barsalou has ever worked based on experimental data.
Thank you hugely for these - really excellent material, and thoroughly useful to me; and, equally useful, the links to further articles that these pages include. Much here to reinforce my existing understanding, and much that will extend it.
A recent article by Sanchez and Reber (2013) in cognition titled Explicit pre-training instruction does not improve implicit perceptual-motor sequence learning. I think does make an argument related to that. Several theories of expertise can be argued as basically bottom up (emphasis on automatic recognition etc), though they are less connected with learning processes.
Many thanks indeed for pointing me to this. An invaluable paper all round for my specialization (music pedagogy and its correlatedness to elite-level instrumental expertise and its acquisition), not least for its cited references to other investigations!
Research and literature of this kind contributes obviously to elucidating the concept and content of "deliberate practice". A great pity, I think, that Ericsson doesn't more emphatically point his readership to it.
I don't know long-term working memory has always kind of argued for an interaction of top down and bottom up processes. On implicit learning I think the issue tends to be it seems to makes fairly strong assumptions about what the subjects are (and are not) doing. And when you come from a process tracing orientation those are not assumptions you like. To bridge from Dr. Reber's important work to the topics Dr. Ericsson writes about requires a lot assumptions that I think Dr. Ericsson has explicitly argued you can not make in various papers (probably most theoretically in long-term working memory but also in the recent chapter in Intelligence).
You might try the papers below. For your purposes, you might glean from these that experts within their goal domain are better at detecting task-relevant information.
Article Memory for the Functional Characteristics of Climbing Walls:...
Article An Ecological Theory of Expertise Effects in Memory Recall