MDxx
+---------->----------+
| |
| MDxxmodel.pdb 1.5 A 156 residues |
| |
*| Ramachandran plot: 89.5% core 9.0% allow 0.8% gener 0.8% disall |
| |
*| All Ramachandrans: 7 labelled residues (out of 154) |
*| Chi1-chi2 plots: 3 labelled residues (out of 86) |
| |
| Main-chain params: 6 better 0 inside 0 worse |
| Side-chain params: 5 better 0 inside 0 worse |
| |
+| Residue properties: Max.deviation: 18.1 Bad contacts: 0 |
+| Bond len/angle: 3.9 Morris et al class: 1 2 1 |
| |
| G-factors Dihedrals: -0.19 Covalent: 0.14 Overall: -0.04 |
| |
| M/c bond lengths: 99.6% within limits 0.4% highlighted |
| M/c bond angles: 96.0% within limits 4.0% highlighted |
*| Planar groups: 86.7% within limits 13.3% highlighted |
| |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ May be worth investigating further. * Worth investigating further.
+---------->----------+
| |
| FINAL_OECR_x.pdb 1.5 A 156 residues |
| |
*| Ramachandran plot: 94.0% core 3.8% allow 1.5% gener 0.8% disall |
| |
+| All Ramachandrans: 3 labelled residues (out of 154) |
+| Chi1-chi2 plots: 1 labelled residues (out of 86) |
| |
| Main-chain params: 6 better 0 inside 0 worse |
| Side-chain params: 5 better 0 inside 0 worse |
| |
+| Residue properties: Max.deviation: 18.8 Bad contacts: 4 |
| Bond len/angle: 1.9 Morris et al class: 1 1 2 |
| |
| G-factors Dihedrals: 0.34 Covalent: 0.63 Overall: 0.46 |
| |
| M/c bond lengths:100.0% within limits 0.0% highlighted |
| M/c bond angles: 100.0% within limits 0.0% highlighted |
| Planar groups: 100.0% within limits 0.0% highlighted |
| |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ May be worth investigating further. * Worth investigating further.
Dear Sir
Yeah.. both the models could be accepted as they contribute to better sum of residues in core and allowed. Second one seems to be better that first as it has 94.0% core
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Statistical Software
- R