All ethoxylated materials are said to contain trace amounts of EO and 1, 4 Dioxane. If my product contains well bellow .1% of ethylene oxide, does this need to be mentioned in the SDS in order to be compliant with California Prop 65? 

According to The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/crnr_notices/admin_listing/requests_info/092013ChangeBasis.html) regarding Prop 65 and ethylene oxide.

Prior to June 1, 2016, employers may use the following legend in lieu of that specified in paragraph (j)(2)(i)(A) of this section:

“DANGER ETHYLENE OXIDE CANCER HAZARD AND REPRODUCTIVE HAZARD AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY ”

“1910.1047(j)(2)(ii)(A)

The employer shall ensure that labels are affixed to all containers of EtO [ethylene oxide] whose contents are capable of causing employee exposure at or above the action level or whose contents may reasonably be foreseen to cause employee exposure above the excursion limit, and that the labels remain affixed when the containers of EtO leave the workplace. For the purposes of this paragraph (j)(2)(ii), reaction vessels, storage tanks, and pipes or piping systems are not considered to be containers.”

"Action level" means a concentration of airborne EtO of 0.5 ppm calculated as an eight (8)-hour time-weighted average (https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=10070).

So here's my math:

.5/1,000,000= 0.0000005

0.0000005 x 100=0.00005%

I can't find a clear answer, or if there's a new regulation concerning EO. Many of our products would only contain trace amounts, if any at all since EO is extremely volatile and they were not required to be reported before, but the UN's Global Harmonizing System or California may have changed the rules.

More Ana Metaxas's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions