For a first introduction this short article (available on Researchgate) would probably be of use:
Grant, A. M. (2016). What constitutes evidence-based coaching?: A two-by-two framework for distinguishing strong from weak evidence for coaching. International journal of evidence based coaching and mentoring, 14(1), 74.
For a first introduction this short article (available on Researchgate) would probably be of use:
Grant, A. M. (2016). What constitutes evidence-based coaching?: A two-by-two framework for distinguishing strong from weak evidence for coaching. International journal of evidence based coaching and mentoring, 14(1), 74.
Laura Hauser I have been working with coaching, guidance and development work for 15 years and often find that the usable theoretical framework and the relevant applicable research is easier to find in other fields. A lot of the really good theory is also often suprisingly old. People like Carl Rogers, John Dewey, Paulo Freire, David Kolb, William Ayers, Ken Robinson and many more have a lot to broaden the view for coaching in terms of understanding how to ask queations, how to listen, how to use strengths, how to understand an utilize motivation, how to create participation, how to facilitate quality communication ... I often think about Kurt Lewin when he points out that we have facilitated something important if our coachee (as an example) improves his or her situation just a little bit og improves his or her relations just a little bit. I think you can also find recent relevant research if you look in to Appreciative Inquiry (AI) and Action Research