Dear Wesley Schouw your honesty admiring. the first thing, we must accept this fact that our universe is a complete entity that none of its belonging working under mechanical event as our last century icons stated. All of my articles describe it in detail.

Article Earth Gravity is not Newtonian

Article Why Einstein's Theory of Gravity is wrong!

Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted

regards

It's an intersting oncept. Can you explain what you believe this fluid is made up of? How do you explain maseless situations? Or how do you explain density within a given unoccupied space which does not contain matter? When we say "space" it's a very generic term. I understand this is a very neglected area of physics. As an object moves through empty galactic space, what is it moving through? The value of nothing is either zero or infinity. And one cannot create a linear function representing travel through space if all related values are zero. Yes we can account for the properties of such an obect which determine its movement forward, but the "Forward through what" is still a very and glaringly obvious logical hole left in current physics. You may be simply describing dark energy or matter. Another likely contender may be that you are attempting to describe the 2 dimensional geometry of our a second rank tensor and its effects on the dimensional makeup of the subsequent dimension. That may be a very valid path of research as well. In fact that could yield very interesting results. . In that case I encourage you to look into this. Perhaps by adjusting the wording a small bit you may just represent what you are attempting to describe as Dark Matter or energy. That's just an opinion. Javad Fardaei do you think these are good directions for him to refine? Wesley Schouw you can message me any time for any information you may need. I would like to help you refine this if possible. You need to address many things. I don't say this to be discouraging just that I see a lot of potential and if you need any help refining this theory let me know! It may unfortunately require adjustment of perception, vocabulary and what is perceived to be what you are describing . I don't mean this in a condescending way only that every theory presented on gravity should address every possible question that may ever arise. I will keep an eye on your work. Good luck!

Alex Wolf III Thank you for your intriguing response to my proposal on the density-driven gravity hypothesis. Your questions and insights are thought provoking, and I appreciate your interest in exploring this concept further. To address your inquiries, the density-driven gravity hypothesis suggests that gravity arises from variations in the density of a fluid-like substance that fills the universe. It proposes that massless situations could be explained by the interplay of density layers within this substance, which influences the motion of objects within it. Regarding unoccupied space, the hypothesis posits that even space considered empty contains this fluid-like substance, albeit at lower densities. Thus, variations in density still exist and contribute to the overall gravitational effects on celestial objects. Your suggestions regarding exploring dark matter, dark energy, and 2D geometry effects are intriguing, and I agree that they could potentially complement the density-driven gravity hypothesis. These areas are worth investigating to enhance the scientific merit of our research. I would be delighted to collaborate with you to refine and explore the density-driven gravity hypothesis further. Your expertise and enthusiasm would be invaluable in this exciting journey of discovery. Let's discuss your ideas and contributions in more detail to pave the way for groundbreaking research in gravitational interactions and cosmology. Feel free to reach out to me at your convenience, and I look forward to working together.

Dear Wesley Schouw,

There is a term that may be new that we touched on in the publications mentioned below, it is the term (gravity unity) that may explain the hypothesis (density-driven gravity), and through the issue of gravity unity, we can explain many cosmic phenomena, such as the pulsating black holes, where we assumed that a group of stars revolving around those black holes in low orbits, while the gravity forces of the gravity fields of among those stars made them be close to each other during their rotation around the black hole, forming a gravity unity among them, caused those stars to rotate with each other in one zone in space around the black hole, so when those stars get in the region of the front side of the black hole, we can catch their lights, but when they get in the region of the back side due to the effects of the immense the gravity force of the black holes which prevents the passage of their lights.

This made those regions around black holes radiate light in a pulsating manner, thus those black holes appear pulsating light regularly, and therefore density-driven gravity hypothesis proposes that variations in the mass distribution within astronomical objects could result in nuanced gravitational effects.

Therefore density-driven gravity hypothesis or gravity unity depends upon the variations of mass distribution within astronomical objects and could result in nuanced gravitational effects which guide variations of models of collision and merging galaxies depending upon the values of masses in each galaxy and their axis as well as their direction of rotation.

I hope that I got understood your question, and I wish my answer is appropriate,

note that you could check more details concerning these publications in my profile on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/ArmenOhan11

Related publication:

https://stm.bookpi.org/RTCPS-V2/article/view/4490

https://stm.bookpi.org/RTCPS-V3/article/view/4504

Dear Wesley Schouw ,

What you write about already existed in 2008...:

Article Tényekkel igazolható a gravitáció valós oka

Independently of each other, my later co-author: Robert Therriault, and we came up with a similar idea:

Article Gravity a paradym shift in reasoning

And since September I have a reasonable explanation of graviton:

Research Proposal Physico-metaphysical proof of the existence of graviton (Fiz...

(It is very interesting that at it exist the next sentence: ontent may be subject to copyright.' see attached file) It looks like someone stole my idea and is already accusing me!

Regards,

Laszlo

This is a briefly explanation of the issue of the gravity particles and understand the mechanism of the universe gravity fields:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CGuwxpmJvRG/?igshid=NjZiM2M3MzIxNA==

László Attila Horváth and @Armen Ohen The density-driven gravity hypothesis differs from the concepts of gravity fields and gravity particles in fundamental ways.

In summary, the density-driven gravity hypothesis presents a unique perspective on the nature of gravity, suggesting that it arises from variations in the density of a fluid-like substance. Gravity fields describe the distribution of gravitational forces around massive objects in classical physics, while gravity particles (gravitons) are hypothetical elementary particles theorized in the context of quantum gravity to mediate gravitational interactions.

Each concept offers different insights into the fundamental nature of gravity and its interactions in the universe.

Dear Wesley Schouw ,

'...The density-driven gravity hypothesis proposes that gravity arises from variations in the density of a fluid-like substance that fills the universe.

But it has a weak point, which I solved 2 years ago, since I published my graviton article... '- I have had this idea before two years ago intuitionally, I have the exact time in my notes... only by following this path can the phenomenon of gravity be well explained! (I got ispiration from my two years daughter when she responded to my question why the ping pong ball falls? She responded because there is nothing!--- But there is a flaw in this train of thought, which needs to be clarified...

(with help of a Romanian woman physicist was corrected my idea)

You said there are no gravitons.

Imagine that we called the gravitational field of the elementary particle a graviton and we use your idea, corrected...

since I had your idea two years ago... But I managed to fix it perfectly

Read my last answer at the next place:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_the_gravity_of_any_massive_object_act_towards_the_center_of_the_object_or_as_curvature#view=64c36f757acf8cedb00cf844

Kind Regards,

Laszlo

Dear László Attila Horváth,

I appreciate your engagement in the discussion about the density-driven gravity hypothesis. It's fascinating to see different perspectives contributing to the exploration of this intriguing concept.

I wanted to share with you that I have been researching the density-driven gravity hypothesis for several years now. In fact, I published a poster on this very topic three years ago, which you might find interesting. You can find it at the following link:

Poster Density driven gravity hypothesis

It can also be found on various other platforms including social media in 2019/2020 depending on the version.

While reading your recent response, I noticed some similarities between your ideas and certain aspects of my prior work. However, I also believe there are some unique insights and differences worth discussing.

Given our mutual interest in this subject I am open to discussion. Exploring the density-driven gravity hypothesis together could lead to exciting advancements in our understanding of gravitational interactions.

Thank you once again for your contributions to this field, and I look forward to the possibility of further interaction.

Best regards,

Wesley Schouw

Dear László Attila Horváth,

I appreciate your engagement in the discussion about the density-driven gravity hypothesis. It's fascinating to see different perspectives contributing to the exploration of this intriguing concept.

I wanted to share with you that I have been researching the density-driven gravity hypothesis for several years now. In fact, I published a poster on this very topic three years ago, which you might find interesting. You can find it at the following link:

Poster Density driven gravity hypothesis

It can also be found on various other platforms including social media in 2019/2020 depending on the version.

While reading your recent response, I noticed some similarities between your ideas and certain aspects of my prior work. However, I also believe there are some unique insights and differences worth discussing.

Given our mutual interest in this subject I am open to discussion. Exploring the density-driven gravity hypothesis together could lead to exciting advancements in our understanding of gravitational interactions.

Thank you once again for your contributions to this field, and I look forward to the possibility of further interaction.

Best regards,

Wesley Schouw