From the Spanish assemblages the differences in modalities inside mousterian methods look to be very slight. Social or economical reasons could be under this technological expressions. How much do you trust in the "stretch" French vision about concepts, methods and modalities?
I think is incorrect to use the word "trust" in this case. The concept Levallois and its variability across methods it's a experimental fact and an archaeological fact whiteout any doubt. Eventually the problem is to understand the meaning of this variability connected to all the other kind of productions in synchronic and diachronic sense . The connection between technological and economical behavior it's an interesting outlook as well as the relations with the environment.
Congratulations, another beliver. You fail un the same topics as the french school: environment, economy, time... historical contrains. Please do not use actual frames as demostration for the past.... where es learning, technological levels?
Several researchers are actually asking this question nowdays, and I think it is a sign towards the close reevaluation of the significance of the usage in the past on one Levallois modality or another. Have you seen this levallois unipolar/convergent core refitted on a preferential/recurrent one discovered close to Bergerac, by Laurence Bourguignon and her team? Best wishes,
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Physiology
- Biosignals
- Biomedical Signal Processing
- Statistical Analysis