Frederic,

What is cosmo-telluric energy?

I believe this link would be helpful to understand it.

http://www.aqc.be/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=87&Itemid=89

Shruthi,

I fear that I am no wiser.

If this is energy, then what form does it take? Electromagnetic, corpuscular, etc.

That linked website has a great deal of simply wrong information in it (polarized water, bizarre notion of oxygen respiration via the skin, etc.) and gives no clue as to what these energies are.

I still wish to know what evidence there is for these 'energies' using *any* apparatus, let alone quantum devices.

But I sense that this topic belongs to the field of orgone energy, ley lines, and razor-sharpening pyramids. I might be wrong.

Thank you for taking the time to search for this concept.

here is about the cosmo-telluric radiations:

http://www.aqc.be/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=87&Itemid=89

there is also this interesting tool:

The Lecher Antenna which seems to be a a Quantum  instrument

https://quantumchanges.wordpress.com/lecher-antenna/

James Garry sir,

A telluric current  or Earth current  is an electric current which moves underground or through the sea. Telluric currents result from both natural causes and human activity, and the discrete currents interact in a complex pattern. The currents are extremely low frequency and travel over large areas at or near the surface of the Earth.

Thanking you

Anand,

I am aware of telluric currents, these are measurable and well-studied by geophysicists - they originate via magnetospheric interactions, I gather.

My query was about 'cosmo-telluric energy'. Whatever that is. 

The link provided by Mr Andres states, "Diseases in the body have a different field frequency, causing misalignment."

I achieve no understanding when I read that.

So if I have a tumour, exactly what is vibrating at a given frequency?

The tumour itself?

A magnetic or electrical field? (which would be trivially measurable)

Or something else?

(I note that that web site also asks, "What would the world be like if we thought Quantumly?" This, I think, is a clear misunderstanding of what quantum physics means)

the target is not to measure physical wavelength but to measure subtle energy.

Frederic,

"...but to measure subtle energy."

I do not understand what 'subtle' means in this context.

Do you mean 'weak'?

If so, cooled detectors are the way to go. The cosmic microwave background is an exceptionally 'subtle' radiation field. Yet it can be detected with cooled bolometers.

(each CMB photon being a few milli-eV in energy)

Or does 'subtle' mean something else?

here are the Color Wavelength (nm) and Frequency (GHz)

         Wavelenght nm 　　Frequency GHz

Red    　　625 - 740         400 - 484

Orange 　590 - 625　　　484 - 508

Yellow　　565 - 590 　　508 - 526

Green　　520 - 565 　　526 - 606

Blue　　　500 - 520　　 606 - 670

Indigo　　435 - 500 　　670 - 700

Violet         380 - 435        700 - 789

Frederic,

There are a number of technologies that allow one to measure photons at the wavelengths indicated. Quantum efficiencies close to unity are possible with heavily cooled detectors, in the near-IR and are able to detect single photons.

A quick search of the usual suspects (http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.5299) shows this to be achievable. I imagine that optical devices, if anything, would be simpler to construct and operate with high QE at higher temperatures.

@James

thank you for the interesting article.

what do you think about applying the Planck lenght and the Planck energy ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_energy

Frederic,

I am unsure as to what you are asking. I am aware of the Planck scale (length, time, energy) but these are measures that are currently far below our ability to probe.

I do not know what you mean by 'applying' them.

?:(

@James

Thank you for your prompt reply.

Applying means to use the Plank formulae to evaluate our target energies.

Is there any interest to use the Neutralino theory ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

Frederic,

I am still not sure what you mean.

How do I 'evaulate' (do you mean, 'measure'?) with the use of an equation?

The Planck energy and scales *exist*. That is clear. In just the same way that the metre and the Joule exist.

Neither can be 'applied' in any way when selecting an instrument to measure a phenomenon.

In any case, you appear to know the wavelengths of interest, so simply find a suitable detector according to your budget.

Or am I being too obtuse?

James,

we wish both to show the energy with a theory and with a detector. We have to build a detector as there is not yet sensor for bovis wave meter.

Frederic,

Again, I don't see the problem.

You are searching (in some unspecified location) for quanta with a certain wavelength (optical, it appears, from your wavelength descriptions). I would buy a suitably sensitive photomultiplier and detector.

Hamamatsu is the brand leader.

Your reference to hypothetical supersymmetric particles baffles me.

You're looking for quanta, are you not?

@James

Thank you for your advise to check at Hamamatsu  site.

http://www.hamamatsu.com/jp/en/product/category/index.html

i could not find any device which could measure bovis energy scale.

Frederic,

>"bovis energy scale"

And pray tell, what is that?

Photomultipliers can detect single quanta / photons.

How faint is your source?.

@James

We already reminded the definition of the Bovis scale in this discussion.

I include a Bovis Chart.

Frederic,

Now you've lost me.

You were, I thought, originally asking about the detection of optical quanta (you showed me a list of energy wavelengths). Now you show me a chart which shows a lot of nouns surrounding a circle (what is the radial coordinate?).

I do not see the relationship - are you looking to detect optical-frequency energies or not?

@James

The initial question is "Are there Quantum sensors to measure cosmo-telluric energy ?" to measure energy wavelengths according to a specific metric (Bovis scale).

Frederic,

"energy wavelengths"

Wavelength. Energy. 

Let's see.

The force carriers that are known are all bosons.

So you're asking about either phonons, gravitons, or photons. No other 'energies' are known to science.

I presumed that you were not looking for gravitons or phonons and that you were looking for quanta (EM) of certain wavelengths.

You keep mentioning this 'Bovis' scale but, from a little googling, I learn that this does not belong to a scientific discipline.

If you are looking for quanta, with certain wavelengths, I can provide technical help.

If you are looking for something else, I cannot.

Happy new year 2016. there are several types of energy to be measured.

is there any link to this radiant energy ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_energy

Frederic,

No.

There is nothing mysterious about EM radiation (light, heat, radio).

The properties of this form of energy have been well-understood since Maxwell's day.

@James Garry We have been looking for a formal model to build a handy device to measure the energy emitted by food.

Frederic,

The energies *emitted* by food?

Not reflected?

The only such energies known to science are:

a) Heat.

Most food is a blackbody radiator and the peak emission wavelength will scale with the absolute temperature of the foodstuff as per Wien's displacement law.

b) Particulate radiation

All substances contain radioactive isotopes.

Bananas are a particularly good source of potassium 40.