Also bear in mind many of the constants of physics do have Doppler shifts ant high energy or intense gravity. Open the following link.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XSzFIFc2hkI3cFJ8Mhtpvi-N0mCqwqF5/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=100582835985029451887&rtpof=true&sd=true

What is in the link:

Doppler shifts of Plank’s constant and permittivities (4th revision)

By Samuel Lewis Reich, 11/5/2021

Cleveland, Ohio, USA

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28909.51688 (4th revision 11/18/2021)

The Doppler shift of Plank’s constant the gravitational constant, magnetic constant, electro static constant, etc. are ignored in texts on relativity and therefore may lead to errors. Dimension factors of equations such as the gravitational constant, magnetic force constant, electro-static force constant, Plank’s constant have time and distance dimensions in them and therefore subject Doppler shifts. If mass and charge in their dimensions has same shift ratio as time or distance the Doppler shift of the gravitational constant would be unity (no shift). But the prevailing view is have the same Doppler shift as frequency.

The gravitational constant and permittivities are mathematical constructs to balance the dimension units of the force equations of fields. The only way of measuring them is to measure the force and divide that by the calculated force with permittivites of 1. They are therefore subject to the Doppler shift of the dimension units that make them up.

For simplicity and the custom for dimensional analysis, but still showing the idea of the dimensional analysis, division and multiplication was used the dimensional analysis instead of differential and integral operators in the dimensional analysis. Please read it with the operators you like substituted.

For example the gravitational constant G: force= mass x distance/ time squared = G x mass squared/distance squared. As a result G= distance cubed/(mass x time squared). Distance, mass, and time are all subjected to Doppler shifts. Therefore Cm is the Doppler shift of mass, Ct that of time, Cd that of distance: the Doppler shift of G= Cd cubed/ (Cm x Ct squared). Obviously also things like velocity= distance/time has Doppler shift of Cv=Cd/Ct if K is the Doppler shift of frequency Ct=1/K, Cd that of wave length=1/K, therefore Cv= 1. There is also the velocity addition theorem account for. Note: Ct=Cd and they are not the same as Cm (how mass changes with relative velocity). Therefore the Doppler shift ratio of G=Cd squared. If charge has mass it should have the same Doppler shift as mass.

Appendix (a paper on omissions in relativity itself):

An omission in space-time

By Reich, Samuel Lewis, 10-28-2021

Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Part I (Based on the properties of the trigonometric Fourier series)

A link to a proof that all Doppler shifts not just the transverse change observed time:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16oJTvHAaV6TYPXMtGdz-NBqc1RW3yY-n/view?usp=sharing

In short the above says: Since the Fourier series decomposes any piece-wise continuous function in the period from A to A+T into sine and cosine harmonics each of frequency nf. Any Doppler shift of a frequency ratio K of that function would change frequency of the harmonics to Knf leaving the rest of the series alone. The means all of value in the period from A to A+T of the original function occur in the Doppler shift function in the period A to A+T/K. The results are just frequency = 1/time hence changes in frequency changes time. Meaning all Doppler shifts change observed time and information rate. The axial shift, unlike the transverse, has an angle factor and there can be blue Doppler shifts. All transverse shifts are red.

For simplicity but still proving the main idea: The above proofs and most of this document only considers the Doppler shift of time (1 dimension) along straight line motion. For variable dependent on n dimensions with Doppler shifts an n dimensional Fourier series is must be used. In addition, for curved motion line integrals should be used.

Part II (a proof from definitions of Part I results):

In all definitions and units frequency= c/(period)time, were c is a constant depending on units. For frequency in Hertz=cycles/sec. & period in sec./cycle, c=1. Which means multiplying all frequencies by the same K as in ALL Doppler shifts (axial, transverse, gravitational, etc.) in a vacuum means all time periods are multiplied by 1/K. If the frequency is near zero, the period is near infinity.

Therefore all Doppler shifts by changing observed frequency change observed time. In the case of blue shifts that leads to information paradoxes. Also there is a direction factor  (cosine of and angle) in axial Doppler shifts (different shifts in different directions) time and frequency becomes multi-dimensional.  Since transverse shift was derived in the Lorentz transformation assuming a non-existing cancelation of the axial shift.  Adding the axial frequency shift should put in some sort of angle factor in the transverse also. But it or its average is small in experimental verification at relativistic velocities.

Part III (Implied by parts I and II)

By only giving the transverse Doppler shift the power to change observed time and not the axial Doppler shift, Lorentz's transformation and Einstein's relativity made a big error of omission.

As a result the angle factor in the axial shift formula becomes a dimension of time and space. For the case of light with encoded information bouncing between mirrors moving toward each other (blue shift) information comes out at a faster rate then it is put in (the only place it could be coming from is the future). No unavoidable noise has been found, tied to the blue shift, to prevent this. Observing changeable events in the future requires that there be futures both with and without the event (multidimensional time) or the event would have been determined (become unchangeable) before the future. Changeable events can be changed by someone in the past after he knows they will happen (someone who can send messengers from the future to his past). In which case the event would not have been observed in the future to begin with to be changed. Note, changeable events are random in the sense they only have a probability of happening, Changeable means NOT having been totally determined by the past. In quantum mechanics particles have a probability of different states and positions at the same clock time. That is saying there are multiple probabile futures. A link to Impacts of angle in the axial shift, if the axial shift changes the things the transverse does. https://drive.google.com/file/d/16a16t5h7dXeUEwEYL7PYB9ke4i2bZO7p/view?usp=sharing

Part IV (other related things)

A link to a contrast aether winds in Lorentz's transformation and Doppler shift. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a_fu5q9WZF4yJBO0YIAbDMdvE6K8iBJm/view?usp=sharing

A link to ways unstated in textbooks relativity changes observed energy in light and particle beams (other than the energy change of each photon or particle). Not error in relativity just overlooked the effect of it. https://drive.google.com/file/d/176wia8LJNxjRAnDqK_XwAOABK5yqs8qM/view?usp=sharing

Part V (Thought experiment showing Axial Doppler shift is in the properties of time and distance)

A stream of drops of water moving at a velocity g to hit some object at Ta drops/second.   If the target moves at a velocity v toward the source the number of drops hitting the target becomes obviously Ta ((g+v)/g).  But if v & g are NOT inline but at angle θ to each other it is Ta ((g+v cos θ)/g). If target moves away from the source the number of drops/second hitting the target becomes Ta ((g-v)/g) and Ta ((g-v cos θ)/g).  That is the same formula as the axial Doppler shift of light except in case of light it is not drops/second but cycles/second or quantums /second.  The drops can be replaced by machine gun bullets, etc.

No. The difference between electrodynamics and gravity is that the gauge group of the former is compact-it’s the Lie group U(1)-while the gauge group the latter is non-compact-it’s the group of diffeomorphisms. That’s the reason why the techniques that work for the former don’t work for the latter.

According to my own research and opinion, it is definitely possible. If gravitation is considered as a curvature of space-time, the curvature can be detected in a photon field.

As an example, you can move the picture in the attachment over your desktop. The curvature of the electromagnetic field becomes visible by the quantization of the pixels with the background lighting, which corresponds to a quantized photon field. The curvature in the quantum field emerges here due to the gravitation. Therefore, you could derive valid quantum equations of gravity waves.

"The energy of a graviton= kg x frequency" is nonsense because the units do not match.

Wolfgang Konle

Explanation: kg (not kilogram, just a symbol for a constant of gravity) includes a constant for the units used. Or Kg=K'g K"g, where K"g = energy/frequency units, constant and K"g a constant for gravity. Which still makes Kg a constant.

Hi Samuel Reich . See the link: https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-quantum-gravity-2699360

See the following link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.02935

See also the following RG link: Article The strange equation of quantum gravity

Also see the following link: https://www.space.com/quantum-gravity.html

Kindly see also the following link: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.interestingengineering.com/a-simple-equation-indicates-wormholes-may-be-the-key-to-quantum-gravity

Moreover see the following link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/quantum-gravity

Samuel Reich "kg includes a constant for the units used"

kg is specified by international conventions. Trying to redefine it is nonsense.

Five problems with gravity equations that need to be resolved, given that gravity needs to transfer energy (gravity waves) when it moves mass and that gravity waves have been clocked at speed of light.

1, The classical equation for the force of gravity ignores the pull of gravity on its own energy (it has mass). That means the mass needed to get Black hole size gravitational intensity is larger than that equation shows. If gravity has a energy of gravitons anything like that of photons of light e=h f, the true equation will be frequency dependent.

2, The real relation of graviton frequency to its energy is not known.

3,The classical equation does not show a limit on how big a mass can be and sill attract more mass.

4, Since astronomical gravity has astronomical size wavelengths and near zero frequencies, the uncertainties in position is also astronomical in size. That uncertainty allows gravitons of lowest frequencies to escape black holes.

5, Gravity waves from moving bodies must show Doppler shifts. That means observed intensity and geometry of the source and the field is changed by those shift. For light: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mT3N7lGvGIlinkGRSSmFWqGS5mkvijHd/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=100582835985029451887&rtpof=true&sd=true