A recent Rand Corporation report for the US DoD considers the "research-practice gap" in terms of how, as "innovations," suicide prevention-related research results are diffused to the field (see pp. 61-88 of linked .pdf). It notes that the usual channels for dissemination of study findings better serve other researchers (e.g., journal articles, conferences) than suicide prevention professionals. Of course, in many areas such "innovations" may not be considered at all because suicide prevention is not recognized as a serious need and available research reports never cross the threshold for adoption even if they are widely disseminated. Have the concepts of innovation theorists such as Rogers (2003) been applied in suicide prevention?
http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR500/RR559/RAND_RR559.pdf