Dear esteemed scientists,

With the growing scientific discourse on the role of antioxidants in health and disease, recent studies have raised intriguing questions about their long-term effects. Some findings suggest that antioxidant supplements may not always be beneficial and could even interfere with the body's natural adaptive responses to oxidative stress.

Given this, can the prolonged use of antioxidants (whether natural or synthetic) be considered a double-edged sword? Do we need to reconsider the concept of 'fighting free radicals' as a therapeutic strategy?

More Sadoon Mohammed's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions