Dear botanist/biologist colleagues in Turkey and elsewhere, if you have considered publishing something in Acta Biologica Turcica (https://www.actabiologicaturcica.com/index.php/abt), I suggest you reconsider. They have a couple of days back published an article (link below), very probably without proper review, in which the author makes false accusations against me. The author was unhappy because I did not accept the species epithet (honouring a Turkish/Kurd poet) he suggested, as at first I thought it could be politically delicate (being aware of the unfortunate anti-Kurd tensions in Turkey). The author convinced me there were no political implications, which I after some hesitation accepted. However, we had just revised our instructions concerning acceptable species epithets (quote): "...taxa should not be named after politicians, ideologies, athletes, musicians, etc. that have nothing to do with botany or the taxon being described." When I communicated this to the author, he started ranting and calling me names. I responded by rejecting the manuscript, after which he was after all willing to change the epithet, but it was too late as I told him. Then all hell broke loose and I became "racist, anti-Kurd, idiot" etc.

I wrote to the editor in chief of Acta Biologica Turcica, asking him to withdraw the paper or at least remove those parts which contained accusations against me and the journal I chief-edit, Annales Botanici Fennici. As there has been no response whatsoever, I can only conclude he and/or his journal could not care less, which testifies about complete lack of scientific ethics. I hope I am wrong!

Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted

More Johannes Enroth's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions