A possible answer in A. Tugui, D. Danciulescu, M.-S. Subtirelu (2019, The Biological as a Double Limit for Artificial Intelligence: Review and Futuristic Debate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 14(2), 253-271, April 2019 https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2019.2.3536).
http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/ijccc/article/view/3536/pdf
How far should AI reach?
"The answer is simple. As long as the individual has his/her own gnoseologic and technological limits to which the existential ones are added, AI cannot overcome us for a very simple reason—we cannot build something we can not formalize, to which we add our fears and/or pride in relation to a technological entity created by ourselves. However, biocomputing, bio computers, and DNA computers could lead to the design of AIs that overcome natural intelligence on certain levels, which means we could talk about the slices of super AI (super-AI-slices), without the scope to completely overcome the natural intelligence."
Alexandru Tugui RE: "AI cannot overcome us for a very simple reason—we cannot build something we can not formalize"
Can you explain why we cannot do this? Or maybe what you mean by this? My thought is that we might assemble something whose components interact in unintended ways that we don't understand and can't predict. So even if it were in principle formalizable, we wouldn't necessarily be able to formalize it ourselves because we don't understand all of the relevant underlying physics or physical mechanisms. An example might be certain bugs in quantum computing that we don't understand and cannot fix because present-day physics doesn't penetrate deeply enough.
Alexandru Tugui RE: "AI cannot overcome us for a very simple reason—we cannot build something we can not formalize"
Can you explain why we cannot do this? Or maybe what you mean by this? My thought is that we might assemble something whose components interact in unintended ways that we don't understand and can't predict. So even if it were in principle formalizable, we wouldn't necessarily be able to formalize it ourselves because we don't understand all of the relevant underlying physics or physical mechanisms. An example might be certain bugs in quantum computing that we don't understand and cannot fix because present-day physics doesn't penetrate deeply enough.
Are the movies and media exacerbating the AI Potentials to take over the humans ?
Karl Pfeifer, the answer is in the paper. Please, read it and we will debate.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence