From positivism vies, your questions are questionable but we need phenomenological approach to understand his messages in different semiotic representations.

Can you answer, why God had eyes before there was light? The evolution theory says there was not any eye structures before light. What is the reasonable alternative? Can you answer in a logical way in layman language.

You wrote "That means that God has had eyes, nose, mouth, ears etc". On what basis do you think that this is a correct interpretation of the expression "as his image and similarity"?

Angelo Cannata How do you interprete 'in his image'. This means we look like the god. That was what these ancient writers meant. They even draw him. Let not twist the words in order to establish a wishful 'truth'.

Ilian Peruhov The text needs to be respected, we cannot interpret it just the way we like. You wrote “Let not twist the words in order to establish a wishful 'truth'”, but this accusation can be made the same way against your interpretation of the text: in interpreting a text you cannot just get what you immediately understand today, with your today’s mentality, today’s culture, your geographic environment. The text needs to be placed in its own context, time, geography, culture.

Once this premise is clear, next step is to consider that scholars and academic specialists of the Bible, after examining deeply the dozens of hypotheses about how to interpret that text, they clear admit that they have no elements for a simple and straighforward interpretation of the expression “So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him” of Genesis 1:27. This is much more honest and respectful than thinking that the text means that God was thought as having external resemblance to our body. Whatever meaning you want to get, you need to find evidence of it. You cannot just say that this is the obvious meaning that you find in the words.

Let’s go further with another step.

There is no evidence in the Bible that God was imagined as having any external physical resemblance to the human body. The opposite can be deduced, for example from the despise expressed in Psalm 115 about false gods shaped in human resemblance:

4 But their idols are silver and gold, made by human hands. 5 They have mouths, but cannot speak, eyes, but cannot see. 6 They have ears, but cannot hear, noses, but cannot smell. 7 They have hands, but cannot feel, feet, but cannot walk, nor can they utter a sound with their throats. 8 Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them.

After having gained these basic points we can try to make our idea about the meaning of Genesis 1:27.

I can add my point to this discussion, based on the biblical text. An aspect that has been almost ignored in all of these discussions is the reference to God, that establishes a strong relationship:

“So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him”.

The expression sets a strong connection of relationship between God and man. The same thing is not said about all the things that were previously created.

So, we have these elements: we are not authorized to interpret the text physically, literally, because there is no evidence in the Bible that this was the way how God was conceived. Rather we have several elements that all together contribute to the concept of a strong and unique relationship with God:

1) man is created at the end, that is, as the culmination of God’s creative action;

2) we have the words “image” and “likeness”, that express an intention, as strong as possible, to depict a relationship with God that is unique, if compared with the rest of the creation;

3) the pronoun referring to God and the mention of God himself reinforces the concept of this bound.

So, I have given material elements on the text, that can seriously guide to this interpretation: the text wants to express that between God and man there is a relationship extremely strong, deep, intense, unique, if compared to the other things that God created. We might go further and interpret this strong relationship as ability to have an intelligent and responsible dialogue and relationship with God.

Compared with this interpretation, thinking that the text wants to say that God has nose and mouth like humans have is not respectful of the text and, at the end, is meaningless and shallow.

Angelo Cannata This what you wrote so extensively is just exactly a w

Angelo Cannata is exactly a twisting of so so many words just to call white is black. Have are good day. For logically thinking creatures when two objects are alike they have many common elements. Precisely.

Some questions dont deserve answer as per bible.

Since yiur intent and ourpose is smartly neutral i will just comment.

In the beginning, So God existed before time ans soace began. God is Spirit. We are humans very different from plants animals and birds. He is in a category totally different. Man was created in dsy six.

In paoer we draw a man with eyes. Its a reoresentation of mans feature in two dimensions. So the nature of Spirit God is reflected./shown created or shown in physicsl man.

We dont ckearly understand Eg Trinity so three is one and one is three. Similarly bible Man & Woman (wife) they are one. We using logic say tgey are male and female that is two individuals.

So thr logic the bible is using is digferent from what you are saying.

Eg God is outside of time He is Absolute time with no beginning. We live in present time wbich science says has a beginning.

So its wiser to ask God hinself for his logic of our queries see from his presoective then accept or deny. choose