Normally we design experiment with 3 replicates, each replicate has like 10 samples/treatment (so total number of samples n = 30/treatment). Then we average the results of these 10 samples to get 1 number/replicate and use these 3 numbers/treatment to performing statistical analysis. However, I have seen some people design experiment with 30 replications, each replication is one sample, so they perform statistical analysis with 30 numbers/treatment. Is this better or bias in any way? I have tried to perform statistical analysis with my data using this setup, and it seems to be much easier to get significant difference among treatments than the usual way with 3 replicates, so I am kind of skeptical. If the total number of samples (n = 30) does not change, what are the good and bad things among designs like 10 samples x 3 replicates, 5 samples x 6 replicates or 1 samples x 30 replicates?

More Duy Minh Pham's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions