@ Raad, nanomaterials are definitely very useful in all sectors but I agree with you that production and utilization should be under strict control by the government so that the end users should be benefited.
Car tires with carbon black and toothpaste with fumed silica - both 'nanoparticles' have been with us many years, as have supported metal catalysts (e.g. 5% Pd/C) and volcanic emissions. None of these materials have 'uncontrolled mass production' as you state. Care with handling all materials is needed but there's too much scare literature out there. Do we ban car tires and toothpaste and try to shut down volcanoes?
BTW, I think you need a period (full-stop) between 'production & Pollution'
I also do not understand the sentence that begins 'Pollution is the most dangerous to the future of mankind'...
The question itself needs rephrasing to put it into grammatically correct English. As stated ('The dangerous of nano materials productions, is real dangers for future humanity?) it is nonsense.
1- thank for your great suggested to distinguish between the production & pollution in my question
yes you are right,
I was asked about the individual groups, who are working alone without central control and plane as well without safety for environmental & researchers
2- thank you again for the correction to my English written sentsnces, sorry my English not in good quality level , I will be very pleased for the suitable sentence suggested
Thank you for your understanding comments. I understand that English isn't your first language so it becomes very important to get anything posted and checked - ideally from a native speaker. In that way, your question isn't misunderstood and you'll get the full benefit of the answers. Perhaps a better title is something along the lines of 'Does the production of nanomaterials entail dangers for the future of humanity/future generations?' You can decide whether you use 'future of humanity' or 'future generations'...
Great appreciated to Professor Dr. Alan F Rawle, for his Valuable comments that have developed more understanding of the main objective of this discussion .
Dear colleague John Francis Miller, it is Very satisfied this your opinion.
Yes you are right, It could not be more than nuclear, noise, viruses, and bacteria, but I meant that there would be a new threat that would increase pollution problems in the world.
Seaton, Anthony, Lang Tran, Robert Aitken, and Kenneth Donaldson. "Nanoparticles, human health hazard and regulation." Journal of the Royal Society Interface 7, no. suppl_1 (2010): S119-S129.