Hello everyone,
I am plotting Response Surface (RS) in Ansys.
I don't know why the estimated surface is far from my design points.
I tried different RS techniques, the most reasonable one is genetic aggregation. However, it is still far from the design points.
Thanks.
The probable reason might be the non-usage of structured approach and accuracy issues in determining the centre and axial design points for RS plotting
Sina S.
The response surface methodology is one of the most widely used experimental designs for optimization (RSM). It is a helpful approach because it allows for the evaluation of the effects of several factors and their interactions on one or more response variables.
However, the property of rotating the design points about the center of the factor space. The moments of the design point distribution remain constant. UNIFORMITY: Uniform precision is the third attribute of CCD designs used to regulate the number of center points (or Uniformity).
A graphic demonstrating a three-dimensional response surface approach, albeit it is truly four-dimensional space that is being depicted because the three components are in three dimensions and the response is in the fourth dimension.
The text, on the other hand, has a graphic displaying a response surface approach in three dimensions, albeit it is truly four-dimensional space that is being depicted since the three components are in three dimensions and the response is the fourth dimension.
Sina S.
Please redefine the center points, factorial points and Axial design points within the design space
You have to rework to identify the ranges of independent process variables
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Computer Engineering
- Computer