why The most definitive way to diagnose a covid is 19 molecular tests and tests
Serology does not have the certainty necessary for diagnosis?
Today, we are looking at the situation in Iran to reveal 19 secrets in the whole country. These diagnoses have been performed in 120 laboratories across the country. All of this is based on indigenous knowledge and at the height of sanctions.
With the possibility that you can have enough, we can be at your disposal and you can control it, you can also use this coach, you can use this coach.
Using the tests performed, you can perform this test with a molecular test. After doing this in laboratory tests, we tried to move in a direction that could be available to you and available to you. If you have tried to dedicate the brother of the nobles to you.
So you can have bad restrictions and be able to come up with different ways to identify a brother. We can do a service study to see how well the provinces of the country can be prepared.
By doing so, serological services cannot be detected in any way and can only provide another person by editing a secret. You can definitely diagnose a molecular test and serologize the test to identify the interface.
According to the decision, it is possible to change the image of the narrator in Iran in two or three months. It can also present itself as a Western official in the west of the country.
Serology shows that the person was exposed to the virus but not necessarily got sick.
In addition to molecular tests, antigen detection may also provide diagnosis, provided it is sufficiently sensitive. For both test types, a negative result is not a proof for absence of infection and disease.
Los métodos moleculares pueden dar falsos positivos por mala toma de muestra, por la presencia de inhibidores del PCR o también depende de la carga viral, las pruebas serológicas son menor sensibilidad y especificidad, el uso de estas pruebas se las debería de usar para estudios epidemiològicos y no para decisiones clínicas como lo afirma la OMS
All infectious diseases have a "window period", which is the interval between the entry of the virus or bacterium into the body and the production of IgM class antibodies. When these appear, if the specificity of the detection system is good, they are diagnostic.
This information also applies theoretically to COVID19: the presence of specific IgMs, if searched with a reliable method, is sufficient for diagnosis. The presence of IgM, however, although diagnostic, cannot be used for prevention measures that are based on carrier isolation. Infected peoples, in fact, in the window period are serologically negative while they are positive for direct research of the viral Rna (tampon and RT-PRC). For COVID19 the window period is reported of 7-10 days, based on different IgM testing specificity and sensitivity.
For COVID-19 the best confirmatory test is polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which detect a very well defined genetic material from small saliva or nasal swabs. This test exactly tells us the the current presence of COVID-19 infection in suspected individuals not like serological tests, antibody. Antibody test can be used for the detection sero-prevalence in the population and as diagnosis. Hence this test shows us how many persons have had the covid-19 illness, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic or individuals with minor symptoms. the main drawback for antibody test is it may not be detected up to certain period of time due to window period. there is also a claim that antibody against COVID-19 might be disappear after 6 months unlike others virus. Antigen tests can also used which shows the protein from the surface of the virus, unlike antibody tests it can indicate current infection but false negative result is likely and need to be confirmed PCR.