04 December 2017 6 8K Report

Hi all. I'm trying to see multinucleated osteoclast with raw264.7 cells but few days after treating cytokines, my raw cells seems to be dying.

I already saw multinucleated osteoclast in mouse primary bone marrow cell, isolated from mouse fumers (50ng/ml RANKL, 30ng/ml MCSF, 4days after treatment.) but I can't see same differentiation in raw264.7 cells.

My protocol is this ; In case of raw cells, cells were cultured in DMEN with 10% FBS and proper antibiotics. 1 day after seeding 4x10^5 cells in 12 well plate, media was changed with alpha-MEM with 10% FBS and treat 50ng/ml RANKL and 30ng/ml MCSF.

But after 2~4days, cells such as macrophages (cells that would soon fused each other) appeared to float, and osteoclasts could not be observed.

RANKL and MCSF were good working in primary cell culture.

Also my raw 264.7 cells also grew well with good morphology until the cytokine treatment.

**I already done these experiment (all cytokine treatment was treated in alpha-MEM media. seeding density is 4x10^5 cell/well. 12well plate.)

- Treat 100ng/ml RANKL,

50ng/ml RANKL,

100ng/ml RANKL+30ng/ml MCSF

100ng/ml RANKL+20ng/ml MCSF

at the same time seeding 4x10^5 cells in 12well .

>> After 2 days, all the cells in the 4well seemed to die.

-Treat 50ng/ml RANKL +30ng/ml MCSF 1day after seeding.

>>After 4 days, the cells seem to die.

-culturing in alpha-MEM without cytokines. (well growing.)

>>A slightly differentiated cell was seen. but not need to care much about it.

one problem in my thought ; when I got this cell line from Korea Cell Line Bank (KCLB), they said this vial was 19passages.

is this passage No. acts largely in my experiment?

Anyone know why my raw264.7 cells not differentiated into osteoclast? Thank you!.

More Seuk-Un Kim's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions