I don't know why so many downvotes without reasonable explanation? and How I can find a researcher that downvote my answer and question?

Please see this question and answer:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_I_can_find_a_researcher_that_downvote_my_answer_and_question

Dear Reza,

This is an excellent idea but a bit dangerous and not really reliable. There are many participants incompetent in certain scientific fields and their opinion would not be reliable without arguments in strictly specific subjects. I think one should not make Face book from RG!

Dear András,

Thanks. I completely agree. However, the current asymmetrical setting with respect to questions against publications would create a bias in terms of information propagation in favor of questions.

For me it is just to acknowledge those publications that I have used as citations.

Dear all,

Good day,

Yes, This is  a bit dangerous and not really reliable. These many participants incompetent in certain scientific fields, their opinions  are downvotes.

The publications are examined by real experts in the field.

Regards

I don't know why so many downvotes without reasonable explanation? and How I can find a researcher that downvote my answer and question?

Please see this question and answer:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_I_can_find_a_researcher_that_downvote_my_answer_and_question

Dear Mostafa

Dear All,

I think that down-votes without suitable explications cannot be opinions of scientists but sudden changes of mood or attempts of self- psychiatric treatment.

Dear George,

I am afraid that IF qualifies not the message or excellence of a paper but the mainstream acceptance (traffic) of a journal. As to up- and down-voting, this is sometimes subjective. Many up-vote/down-vote without reading the paper. This can be deduced partly from the very low numbers of RG open reviews. When there is on gratis work, RG fellows are very careful.     

I think it is a good idea, provided the one voting really has been reading the text. This gives a more serious but of course subjective Impression in Addition to the Journal Impact, which is often doubtful.

I think it is a good idea, provided the one voting really has been reading the text. This gives a more serious but of course subjective Impression in Addition to the Journal Impact, which is often doubtful.

I think it is a good idea, provided the one voting really has been reading the text. This gives a more serious but of course subjective Impression in Addition to the Journal Impact, which is often doubtful.

Thank you all for your great opinions.

Just to mention the idea behind this question was Only adding an Upvote mechanism for the publications (No Downvote mechanism is recommended), and also the number of upvotes should not be considered in calculating the RG scores. You can look at it as a 'bookmark-and-share' mechanism for papers and publications.