Today, 1 July 2023, the European Space Agency (ESA) is launching the European Space Agency (ESA) space telescope EUCLID to explore "dark matter" and "dark energy" and similar hitherto unanswered questions, including why the universe is expanding. In what specific ways will learning more about these astrophysical phenomena influence life here on Earth currently, in the foreseeable future, and in the long term? Further, if you have scientific and / or mathematical expertise in this or a related field, can you indicate whether the findings of the ESA space telescope may help you to advance knowledge in your particular scientific or mathematical field of endeavor? If you are following the new Webb Space Telescope, will the Euclid Space Telescope have any bearing on the space exploration performed by the Webb Space Telescope?
Source LINK: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-to-provide-coverage-for-launch-of-esa-dark-universe-mission
Dear Dr. Nancy To my understanding to promote our science in better perspective, we must leave all the imaginary scientific opinion of last century on aside and look for unambiguous empirical evidence of nature.
What does that mean?
One, there is no single one dimension static mathematic equation, formula that it does not recognize temperature and pressure cannot describe a three dimension of nature that it is changing constantly in our universe.
Two, nothing in our universe is working mechanically, as our science peruses. Thus there is no pushing/pulling exist in our universe.
By having said that, dark-matter and DM energy exist due to atom interaction, where each atom is following their evolution journey,
Conclusion : our universe is not result of accidental big bang in first place, and we must recognize the universe as a complete well organize entity,. simply everything is a copy of the universe, everything is supported from outside of their body so the universe.
Reading these two articles help my point, yet they would not pass peer review, or mechanical and mathematic science that we think exist on nature.
https://www.academia.edu/39954648/Dark_Matter_in_the_Quantum_Universe
Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted
best wishes
It is important because of what little we know about these elusive constructs and have virtually no idea or concept how these fundamental constants affecting space and time affect a larger overall scientific picture. There is virtually no way to anticipate what information will be revealed about dark matter or energy that may fundamentally change how we view relativity, quantum related aspects, or time. As I write about in my research document on Grand unified theory (attached and on page) a good way to get data about elusive constructs such as dark matter and dark energy is primarily done through two ways: deduction by accounting for math and models related to relativity and deduction related to math and models related to quantum phenomenon, then calculating and properly accounting for the differences, and making assumptions based on the interplay between other time and space related constants of a certain equation or framework, then deducing how the dark matter and energy are affecting other constants basically via lack of information. This is incredibly difficult with no standardized system to account for quantum phenomenon, relativity related phenomenon, and time at the same time. The theory presented is a viable and checkable way to easily observe this interplay between tensors, precisely set numerical values for this such as light, acceleration, ect. My theory is again as I said in my other answer not the only feasible way to do this, and I am in no way claiming that superiority or grandiose. If one wanted to do calculations such as these scans an equation which accounts for relativity/quantum/time accurately, they would have to perform all those calculationsseparately, account for correct values of things like tensors and operators, mathematically deduce and parse how to factor in time and quantum phenomenon, and then make assumptions from a singular data set or comparison of all three. All of these methods don't provide the level of accuracy one can get by simply placing measurement instruments even slightly closer to what is attempting to be studied. As well, EUCLID doing this presents a very simple staple of the Scientific process: by being at one fixed point on earth or even from various moving points from previous launches of measurement instruments related to Dark Matter and energy, we are essentially measuring from limited fixed points and building up data iteraively. Or launching measurement devices and iteratively integrating information from previous measurements and calculations. Each time we get closer and closer to answer and can make measurements from different places in space as well as time to arrive at conclusions. Both mathematics and these measurements being optimized together will lead us to answers we desperately need about dark matter and dark energy. People who focus on our current lack of ability to fully measure things on Dark Matter and dark energy tend to gravitate towards study of Unified Theories such as me or Vladimir Majernik for example. The problem qill never be fully optimized without a reliable way to perform calculations discussed here.
The question here is whether astronomy or the outer space exploration is worth our while and our resources. The outer space exploration has important technological consequences, but astronomy in general started as a part of the quest for understanding or universe, which is the goal of science. I believe that both science and technology will continue to be pursued in the future.
Javad Fardaei ,
Thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate your radical new thinking about the importance of prioritizing and recognizing the source of all life in the universe. The links you included in your reply add a lot to provide support for your scientific claims about the true nature of reality.
Best regards.
Nancy Ann Watanabe
Alex Wolf III ,
Thank you for your reply, which articulates some specific ways the EUCLID Space Telescope can help to advance your scientific research Theory of Everything work. Most interesting to me is the way your research focuses on the mysterious phenomenon of Dark Matter.
Best regards.
Nancy Ann Watanabe
Jose Gaite ,
Thank you for your thoughtful reply, which broaches the matter of the objectives, aims, and purposes to be served in the current scientifically and technologically advanced exploration of space. Aside from increasing knowledge about Earth's astrophysical environment beyond the solar system, what is the relevancy of TOE to Earth? Is the expense of trips to the Moon and Mars worth the downside risk of neglecting other critical areas of scientific investigation requiring capital outlays and lots of staff and possibly less materiel? How is peering into the remote corners of the universe going to help Earth?
Best regards.
Nancy Ann Watanabe
Dear Nancy Ann Watanabe ,
I see your point in regard to the TOE and similar quests. They have mainly intellectual value and no foreseeable application. However, pursuing such kind of science is inexpensive, compared to space research. Personally, I favor applied research, but I have to admit that I have spent very many hours thinking about scientific problems without known application :-)
Dear Jose Gaite you point out nice preceptive angle.
Unfortunately science does know the meaning of dark matter, because it is following wrong and mechanical theories of past century.
please read this..
https://www.academia.edu/39954648/Dark_Matter_in_the_Quantum_Universe