Fluorescence being a form of luminescence ("cold-body radiation"), one needs an energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state of the system in order have fluorescence following excitation of the electrons in the system. This rules out metals in which there is no energy gap and the excited electrons de-excite through excitation of acoustic phonons, amounting to heating up the lattice, to cool down by the process of heat transfer to the heat bath it is in contact with.
Because in metals analysis is processed metal powders acids to be converted into a liquid state, causing the loss of some of their components and lead to a lack of accuracy of the results, unlike polymers and ceramics.
However, quantum confinement effects[1,2] in nanosize (artificial) "metals", might, not only, permit[3] fluorescence modes in nano-metals, but, it might even, paradoxically, enhanced[4,5] fluorescence (synergy).
Metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF) seems as a promising strategy to amplify[5] the signal and significantly improve the potential of fluorescence based technology in bio-applications.
1. Quantum confinement effect - an overview http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/23484/3/03.chapter%201.pdf
2. Quantum Confinement Effects in Materials Chemistry
Ioannis Samaras : Just a brief remark: metallicity is a property of extended systems - in principle, macroscopic systems. Therefore, my earlier comment is not in conflict with your remarks in the second and further paragraphs of your above comment.
No, not any, conflict; it was, just, a, systems' size (scaling), contrast, by passing from bulk (extended) metallic systems, drowning all (im)possible fluorescence modes, to nano-metals' fluorescence (bring to light, possible) modes[1].
1. because they are drowning (do not favor) the previous (bulk, lower energy) modes.