Sea water fishes more content of EPA & DHA i.e omega-3 and 6 than river water. For example marine water fisher Mackerel, seer fish and river water Carla and Rohu. Therefore, sea water fishes are good for human health.
Sea water fishes more content of EPA & DHA i.e omega-3 and 6 than river water. For example marine water fisher Mackerel, seer fish and river water Carla and Rohu. Therefore, sea water fishes are good for human health.
Is this scientifically proven? I read that long-lived fish (haringa), eat everything that a man throws into the sea ... and heavy metals ... when we eat it ... the circle closes ... Is it similar to a river fish? The most fascinating is fish from nature. Artificial fishponds give the fish a lesser taste?
Since sea water contains salts of sodium, potassium, rbomide and iodide salt water fish would possess some of these minerals which are predominantly absent in fresh water and fresh water fish.
Due to presence of fatty acids and minerals in high amount , eating sea fish better than river fish, similarly the river fish contain minerals and vitamins with fatty acids which also helpful to our body.
Protection of 'Biodiversity' is only solution of protection of 'Nature' as elimination of 'Flora', 'Fauna' & 'Water life' via human actions shall create opposite reaction on human race implicitly.
Penetration of human inside sea for explicit purpose may create threat by sea as natural boundaries between humans via continents is balanced by sea altogether with sea lives.
My belief, 'Consciousness' of 'Nature' may be more than 'Stupidity' of humans and humans via a chemical reaction of 'Nature'