Why does the concept of "turbulence" NOT finding a place in the design of gas well fracturing treatments associated with a porous medium?

Actually Required: Turbulence concept while designing gas well fracturing treatments as emphasized by Cooke.

Minimum Requirement: Laminar flow with inertial effects as emphasized by Geertsma.

What is currently followed: Laminar based diffusivity equation.

Using diffusivity equation for describing fluid flow through a complex heterogeneous reservoir, and then, discussing so much on optimization and uncertainty - why is it so?

Yes, we were NOT able to move forward after Darcy's momentum equation in 1856 that is used to describe fluid flow through a porous medium at the macroscopic scale. I mean, till date, we DO NOT have an equation that can describe fluid flow through a porous medium at the microscopic scale.

In other words, I AM NOT SUPPOSED to look at any details of a porous medium at the microscopic scale, when we talk about Darcy's approach.

It can be noted that the concept of microscopic-scale based Navier-Stokes equation can well be applied for a porous medium conceptualized as a bundle of parallel capillary tubes - which is highly idealistic - with reference to the actual complicated pore geometry associated with a typical porous medium. The problem becomes further complicated with a fractured reservoir having multiple continuum.

Given this fact, Is it fair for us to introduce the concept of "nano-Darcy" associated with a shale gas reservoir OR the mobility of nano-particles associated with chemical EOR?

Is it possible to mathematically merge nano- and macro- scales together - associated with the concept of nano-Darcy OR nano-particles?

Appreciate your time and energy.

Thanks in anticipation.

Regards,

Suresh Kumar.

More Suresh Kumar Govindarajan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions