As Bingham Model assumes Newtonian behavior of magnetorheological fluid (MRF) after crossing yield stress but in actual practice MRF is Non-Newtonian after yield. So more accurate model is Herschel-Bulkley model which uses power law index after yielding. Hence Herschel model is more complex though it's more accurate as well. Still people are using Bingham model more in their research. So Is there any other benefit of Bingham Model over Herschel-Bulkley model other than it's simplicity?
These persons are here on RG:
Comparison between different models for rheological characterization of activated sludge
- September 2011
- Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering 8(3):255-264
- 📷Amirhossein Khalili
- 📷Navid Mostoufi
- F. Sadeghi
- Show all 7 authors
- 📷MOHAMMAD MEHRNIA
I appreciate your response. I agree Herschel-Bulkley model fits more accurately to Non-Newtonian Fluid But my question is still so many researchers are using Bingham Model. Except simplicity of Bingham model, Is there Bingham model possess any other benefit over Herschel-Bulkley?
Because those who know are here on RG I think you can contact them.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Physiology
- Physiological Processes
- Stress