“Dominant extreme democratic outcomes” as in “mob-rule,” are unstable forms of governance. The US is a republic not a democracy, a big difference! Over the last 200 plus years elected US officials vary relative to their oath in defending and protecting the US Constitution. The outcome of the “2016” election brought in more officials who claimed to embrace the US Constitution during their candidacy.

The primary objective of the US Constitution is to support and protect the US Citizen’s “unalienable Rights” from the crimes of others and from the threat of any government, or ideology, including the ruling-class in DC.

I understand over the last number of decades, due to the evolution of technology, the globe morphed into a local neighborhood. It is obvious that cultural globalism is on the horizon in units of generational time.

Perhaps, researching the constructal law relative to governance, may help our global neighborhood evolve peacefully towards social harmony.

https://www.academia.edu/37021128/Scientific_Proof_of_Our_Unalienable_Rights

Good day Michael

Who should be expected to benefit from EDOs? That is the question, locally and internationally....who and why?

Dear Lucio Muñoz,

No one benefits from EDOs (Extreme Democratic Outcomes)!

That is why the US is a constitutional republic, the rule of law, not the rule of the mob. The rule of law applies to both the minority and majority. If one has issues with the US, they are free to leave. However, the US is having issues with the masses from the international community wanting to immigrate.

Relative to my understanding there was no “USEXIT,” the US is still engaged throughout the world, perhaps, too much.

Regards,

Mike

Okay, Nobody is benefiting from Trump government....Not the minority, not the majoirity, not other democratic countries; and not non-democratic/authoritarian governments....

Keep in mind, a normal liberal democratic outcome is respectfull of the rule of law; an extreme democratic outcome is not....The traditional GOP was expected to be respectful of the rule of law...against deficits and bail outs....the Trump GOP should be expected to be irrespectful of the rule of law....for huge deficits and huge bail outs/tax cuts...

Let's leave it here.

Have a nice day

In the US constitutional republic there is no such thing as a “Trump government” or any other government for that matter! If the ruling-class gets out of hand, the courts will be the limiting factor. When one reads the US Constitution, one will find there are checks and balances between the branches of government.

Michael, tell THAT to President Trump, he may disagree with you....Had Trump party won both majority in house and senate 'YOUR RULE OF LAW expectation would have been empty....as the true majority took the house then the true majority view will push hard on the minority view behind the EDO,,,,

Your answer to my question was that nobody benefits neither locally or internationally from the existence of dominant EDOs, can you elaborate why you think so?

How do you know President Trump will disagree with me?

I don’t know what to make of Trump, over the last 30 years he changed his party affiliation several times. I would not be surprise if Trump wins in 2020 and loses both houses in Congress to the Democrats, he may be the first President to switch parties while in office. What I do know, many in the ruling-class dislike him. He is not part of the political elite. He is just a popular man on the street. Trump’s election, distressed the oligarch.

EDO has nothing to do with the US. EDO is a perverted form of governance that is short in its life, ending in violence, having little regard to the individual’s “unalienable Rights.”

Michael, it is just an informed guess.....

Again, your answer to my question was that nobody benefits neither locally or internationally from the existence of dominant EDOs, can you elaborate why you think so?