I have assessed (Trait measure of attribution - for positive and negative situations ) for 85 sports persons. They all went on to play a competitive match. After the match (T1), they filled a state attribution questionnaire based on the result of the match (win/lose). Total number of winners were 51 and 34 lost their match. They all went on to play their next game (T2) and filled the state attribution scale, based on the result of the game (Win/lose) again. From the 51, who won their match at (T1), only 35 won and 16 lost the second game. From the 34, who lost their game at (T1), only 16 won their second game and 18 lost again.
I want to see whether attributions remain same? (trait-state-state)
whether one behaves like their trait attributions?
Any help regarding statistical approach would be appreciated.
For me this is a little unclear. Do you have two or three measurement occasions? If the former ,it is not a panel and a regression like analysis of t2 on t1 is appropriate.
Kelvyn Jones i have collected data at 3 points. before the match, after 1st match and after 2nd match.
OK, have a look at this site
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/mlwin/mlwin-resources.html#multipleresp
and especially straightforward analysis
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmm/migrated/documents/repeated-measures.pdf
and also this site
http://www.pilesofvariance.com/
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Political Science