i want to have these components in the cycle( energy storage(thermal or CAES), solar collector or solar pv, solar reactor, wind turbine, CCHP plant, biomass boiler) i want to have exergy and energy analysis in my project, thanks
As Heather commented, EES is a good software to solve thermodynamics problems. You can fined and learn working with it easilly. If you want to work with a user friendly software and dont like to write codes, Thermoflow and Cycle Tempo are two useful devices. In Tehran you can join PTEC training company to learn how to work with them.
As Dr. G. Ahmadi says, 'EES' Could help you. Using this software you will be a profesional cycle designer in your way. EES is a unique and very professional tool for any energy system modeling.
I have used Thermoflow tools and Aspen Plus. I haven't seen solar functions in Aspen, but I was using it for a very different study. The Thermoflow Thermoflex product is very good but may not include all the solar functions you are looking for either. I have seen that the product is upgraded regularly and often includes new model functions. I recommend that you check with Thermoflow - they are pretty responsive.
I agree with Paul Willson, the Thermoflex product of Thermoflow is very useful but if you need all the components that you say, the full Thermoflow package is more recommendable (but more expensive too).
With Cycle-Tempo, you can design, analyze, optimize and monitor the thermodynamics of the energy system that you design and operate. Special features include:
Extensive and validated model library that includes conventional, but above all, innovative systems and components (fuel cells, IGCC, CO2 capture plants, ORC turbogenerators, refrigeration absorption systems, etc).
Ready-made models of components and even of complete energy conversion systems, so that you can tailor them to your special needs, shortening the model development time.
Full-featured exergy analysis for the correct optimization of the design and operation of your system.
Possibility of real-time integration with existing plant-wide data monitoring systems for performance analysis and trouble-shooting.
Robust and efficient solver for large non-linear algebraic systems of equations, tailored to the special case of mass and energy balances. Our solver proved itself on the most demanding problems.
You may also consider Ebsilon Professional. It should have all components you need. Not sure it does energy analysis though. Aspen Plus would be a good choice too but you would need to write your codes for solar and energy storage components. As it's been said above, if you've got all governing equations at hand, EES is a good option.
If you are interested in formulating your governing equations and writing your own code, then EES is a very good environment that allows for that in addition to parametric and optimization studies, especially when coupled with MATLAB.
If you are interested in using mainly predefined components without worrying about numerical solution details of the governing equations, then I recommend IPSEpro 7.0. It has extensive libraries for most fields in energy and chemical engineering (e.g., biomass, CSP, vapor cycles, gas cycles, refrigeration cycles, TES, etc.).
I prefer IPSEpro over other options such as ASPEN Plus, Cycle-Tempo, ASPEN HYSYS, TRNSYS, and Thermoflex because of its more comprehensive nature. In other words, if you are interested in a polygeneration system of any sorts, IPSEpro is the best option in my opinion (Thermoflex also has very similar capabilities). If you are interested in more specialized processes, then other software may provide more detailed models and more in-depth analysis (e.g., ASPEN Plus for thermochemical processes).
The starting point of thermodynamic logic is: 1) opposing perpetual motion. 2) The irreversibility of dynamics. Let's look at how to get Carnot efficiency = 1-T1/T2.
1.1 There are many kinds of type 2 perpetual motors, each of which is a natural phenomenon.
A) Machine A: against the irreversibility of thermodynamics (diffusion, heat conduction, friction, etc) - dynamics;
B) Machine B: Utilizing the Difference of Carnot Efficiency (Reversible Thermodynamics) - Thermodynamics
1.2 A and B belong to different disciplines. There is a parallel relationship between them and there is no logical mutual inevitability.
1.3. Logic of the Second Law of Thermodynamics:
Experience induction, deny that A machine==> B machine can not be manufactured==> All material Kano efficiency: 1-T1/T2.
1.4 The logic of the second law of thermodynamics violates the physical logic that A and B cannot be inferred from each other.
1.5 The second law of thermodynamics elevates the "irreversibility", which is in fact only a kinetic experience.
📷 Detailed discussion can be found in the following figure.
1. The second law of thermodynamics loses the ability of quantitative prediction.
2. Data processing method of law 2 of thermodynamics violates scientific discipline: modifying experimental data to satisfy theory
See the picture for details.
3. The second law of thermodynamics can only be called science if it reaches the same quantitative prediction ability as Newton's second law, otherwise it is pseudoscience.
4.Unfortunately, all the charts of enthalpy and entropy are organized in this way.
1. Logic of the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Subjectivism, Logical Jump, Interdisciplinary Argumentation.
2. New thermodynamics pursues universality, two theoretical cornerstones:
2.1 Boltzmann formula: ro=A*exp(-Mgh/RT) - Isotope centrifugal separation experiments show that it is suitable for gases and liquids.
2.2. Hydrostatic equilibrium: applicable to gases and liquids.
3. The second and third sonic virial coefficients of R143a derived from the new thermodynamics are in agreement with the experimental results.
3.1. The third velocity Virial coefficient derived is in agreement with the experimental data, which shows that the theory is still correct when the critical density is reached.
4. See Appendix Pictures and Documents for details.